sons and wife, Smt. Kushal Devi, executed a farkhati nama (release deed) under which the three sons, after getting Rs. 10,000 each, gave ... sons started their separate businesses. On the basis of the release deed, it was claimed before the income-tax authorities under section
Plaintiff-petitioner in the suit has inter alia challenged release
deed dated 22.2.2002 allegedly executed by her in favour of defendant
Civil Revision ... said claim of the plaintiff and defended the
execution of the release deed in question as legal and valid.
In the amendment application Annexure
consequent mutation no.638
entered on its basis because the said release deed was not executed by
Lakhmir Singh and also because the suit land ... releasee. On the contrary, it was held that a deed called a deed
of release can, by using words of sufficient amplitude, transfer title
1108
dated 03.08.2005, (hereinafter referred to as the "registered
released deed") in favour of the plaintiffs (who are his real
grand sons ... defendant No.2 is still alive and never
challenged the release deed till date), on false and fictitious
grounds, instituted a civil suit
attorney
vide cancellation deed dated 8.10.2001. The defendant got a release deed
No.2519 dated 12.10.2001 without legal right to do so and the same ... void being the result of fraud. It is pleaded that said release deed is
against the memo No.619STRI dated 3.2.2000 as defendant
with consequential relief of permanent injunction
praying for a decree that release deed/relinquishment deed dated
22.8.2006 bearing registration No.1611/1 and the subsequent ... released
the ownership rights in their favour. However, nothing is
stated about the right of the plaintiffs.
(e) On the basis of the released deed
filed by the plaintiffs, they prayed for a
declaration that the release deed dated 10.07.2001,
purportedly executed by defendant No.1 and late Balbir Singh ... Balbir Singh (since deceased), and got procured a release deed
dated 10.07.2001, as regards the suit property in their favour.
Further, suit property was stated
present suit "......seeking possession and declaration to the effect that
release deed bearing vasika no.2274 dated 27.7.2004 and mutation
no.1756 dated ... sanctioned on the basis of said release deed are
wrong, illegal, null, void, mere paper transaction just to deprive the
plaintiff of her birth right
same
further. The plaintiff challenged the validity of the impugned release deed
on the ground that she was an illiterate, rustic and pardanashin female ... execution of sale
deed were not available, therefore, on the instructions of the plaintiff
herself, instead of sale deed, the impugned release deed in respect
Citation No:=2024:PHHC:109559
EFA-41-2022 2024:PHHC: 109559
Release Deed No. 6510 dated 12.03.2015 had relinquished his rights regarding
the said property ... other hand, the stand of the decree holder was that the
release deed had been executed within a mala fide intention only to defeat
