Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 44 (0.56 seconds)

J Usha vs South Central Railway (Secunderabad) on 12 November, 2024

Railway Family Pensioners Family Pensioneres Family pensioners Family pensioners covered under RELHS covered under RELHS covered under RELHS covered under RELHS 97. 97 with fixed ... Pensioners (unmarried (unmarried daughters / daughters/divorced divorced daughters) daughters) covered covered under RELHS under RELHS 97 to 97 to medical facility whom UMID card
Central Information Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J Usha vs Ministry Of Railways (Railway Board) on 12 November, 2024

Railway Family Pensioners Family Pensioneres Family pensioners Family pensioners covered under RELHS covered under RELHS covered under RELHS covered under RELHS 97. 97 with fixed ... Pensioners (unmarried (unmarried daughters / daughters/divorced divorced daughters) daughters) covered covered under RELHS under RELHS 97 to 97 to medical facility whom UMID card
Central Information Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J Usha vs South Central Railway (Secunderabad) on 12 November, 2024

Railway Family Pensioners Family Pensioneres Family pensioners Family pensioners covered under RELHS covered under RELHS covered under RELHS covered under RELHS 97. 97 with fixed ... Pensioners (unmarried (unmarried daughters / daughters/divorced divorced daughters) daughters) covered covered under RELHS under RELHS 97 to 97 to medical facility whom UMID card
Central Information Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A S Raman vs Southern Railway on 15 January, 2025

application (offline) dated 18.08.2023 seeking the following information: "I am a RELHS-96 subscriber availing the medical benefits from HR/TCR. My estt. Unit ... rule under Rlys.LAW,612. Sub sec.11 . retd. Employees vide RELHS/96. Please clarify 1) The procedure and the rule is violated
Central Information Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Syed Mohd Lutfullah vs East Central Railway (Hajipur) on 30 June, 2025

रे लवे बोड के प1 सं. No-2011/H/28/1/RELHS/Court Case दनांक 31.05.12 के तहत मेRडकल के मद मे कटौती क गयी ... रे लवे बोड के प1 सं No-2011/H/28/1/RELHS/Court Case दनांक 31.05.12 का अनप ु ालन करते हुए एवं समापक भुगतान
Central Information Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nagsen Ragho Tayade vs Ministry Of Railways (Railway Board) on 17 December, 2024

वधवा प3ु य को मलने वाल म4 ु त मेडीकल सु वधा (RELHS Facility) प,शनर एवंम4 ु त रे ल या ा पास सु ... म8ृ यु के प:चात यह म4 ु त मेडीकल सु वधा (RELHS), एवंम4 ु त रे ल या ा पास सु वधा ऐसी
Central Information Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ganesh Ragho Tayadh vs Ministry Of Railways (Railway Board) on 25 October, 2024

हत / तलाकशुदा +वधवा पु. य को 0मलने वाल$ मु1त मे2डकल सु+वधा (RELHS Facility) प% शनर रे ल कम#चार$ एवम ् रे ल कम#चार ... वधवा प6नी क म6ृ यु के प9चात ् यह मु1त मे2डकल सु+वधा (RELHS) ऐसी आ()त पु ी क बंद करने से संब(ंधत रे
Central Information Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next