title of the plaintiffs
4
had in fact executed a relinquishment deed dated
09.12.1966 and that he had received ... paragraph No.14(a) and denied
the lawful execution of the Relinquishment deed and
contended that the said Relinquishment deed is false and
frivolous
said property had executed a
document styled as 'Relinquishment Deed' on
12.08.2011 conveying the entire property in CTS No.769
jointly in favour ... submitted that the trial
Court grossly erred in holding that the relinquishment
deed dated 12.08.2011 at Ex.P.1 was inadmissible in
evidence for want
written statement that 2nd defendant i.e. his son
had executed relinquishment deed dated 19.06.1999 in favour of the
1st defendant herein (father ... Therefore,
defendant No.1 contended that in view of execution of relinquishment
deed, 1st defendant is the sole owner in possession of the property.
Therefore
Vyalikaval Society which had formed the
layout has not executed relinquishment deed in pursuance of
the approval of layout i.e., in the year ... ground that the
Society has not executed relinquishment deed, the petitioner
who is a bonafide purchaser of site cannot be penalized or
made
approved, the relinquishment was necessary for
the petitioner to have done. Therefore, the mere fact
that the relinquishment deed is not executed by the
petitioner ... statutory
obligations. However, in the case on hand, no
such relinquishment deed is executed by the
petitioner in favour
name stating that the petitioner herein had executed a
relinquishment deed dated 25.10.2012, and on the basis of said
application made by the 1st respondent ... contending that he had
not executed any relinquishment deed in favour of the 1st
respondent herein and the said relinquishment deed, on the
basis
document, defendant No.1 alleged to have created
documents entitling as relinquishment deed. Though the
plaintiff had 1/3rd share in the suit property ... Court has not taken into
consideration the relinquishment of share made by the
plaintiff. Since the relinquishment deed being between co-
sharers and there
plaintiff in O.S.No.225/2004 rests
on the relinquishment deed and Will set up by him which is
4
also the same defence ... 2004, the trial Court has
adverted to the validity of relinquishment deed and Will.
Even in the present appeal, the validity of relinquishment
deed
establish the identity of the suit schedule property other
than the relinquishment deed dated 3.6.2016 which is
only amongst the petitioner's family members ... claimed by him
has not produced any document other than the
relinquishment deed dated 3.6.2016 executed in his
favour by his family members. Further
Accordingly, plaintiff and the defendant
No.2 jointly executed a relinquishment deed dated
15.03.2004 in favour of Defendants 1 and 3 which
transaction was reported ... residing there with his family. The
plaintiff having executed the relinquishment deed
in favour of defendant No.2 along with defendant
