ought to have been raised in a previous litigation should not be relitigated in subsequent proceedings. The extended form of res-judicata more popularly known ... importance. It is one thing to refuse to allow a party to relitigate a question which has already been decided; it is quite another
ought to have been raised in a previous litigation should not be relitigated in subsequent proceedings. The extended form of res-judicata more popularly known ... importance. It is one thing to refuse to allow a party to relitigate a question which has already been decided; it is quite another
parties seeks to reopen that issue. Here also bar is complete to relitigation but its operation can be thwarted under certain circumstances:-
"But there
Shachindra Pratap Singh [P.I.L.] vs State Of U.P.Thr.Secy.Deptt.Of
State Of U.P. And 5 Others vs Shri Raj Veer Singh on 16 April
The Commissioner, Commercial Tax vs M/S Emami Ltd. on 6 August, 2024
HIGH COURT
parties seeks to reopen that issue. Here also bar is complete to relitigation but its operation can be thwarted under certain circumstances.
51. Accordingly
issue and decided by a court of competent jurisdiction cannot be relitigated in future between the same parties or their successor-in-interest ... present case, the Petitioner cannot be said to have relitigated a matter which has been previously determined in an action between himself and the contesting
Revisional jurisdiction is not intended to be a mechanism for relitigating cases or reopening settled matters. High Courts cannot ordinarily interfere with factual findings arrived
examples cited as an abuse of the process of the court is relitigation. It is an abuse of the process of the court and contrary ... justice and public policy for a party to relitigate the same issue which has already been tried and decided earlier against him. The reagitation
