M/S. Pdmc Industries vs Ministry Of Micro Small And Medium ... on 19 December, 2025
ought to have been
raised in a previous litigation should not be relitigated in
subsequent proceedings. The extended form of res-
judicata more popularly known
The South Indian Bank vs M/S. Pdmc Industries on 12 December, 2025
Author: Anil
Smt. Gangamma vs State Of Karnataka on 21 July, 2025
Author: M.Nagaprasanna
Bench: M
ought to have been raised in a previous
litigation should not be relitigated in subsequent proceedings. The
extended form of res judicata, known as constructive ... entirety of a decided cause of
action is sought to be relitigated; (ii) issue estoppel or, 'decided
issue estoppel', where an issue
ought to have been raised in a previous litigation should not be relitigated in subsequent proceedings. The extended form of res-judicata more popularly known ... importance. It is one thing to refuse to allow a party to relitigate a question which has already been decided; it is quite another
ought to have been raised in a previous
litigation should not be relitigated in subsequent proceedings.
The extended form of res judicata, known as constructive ... decided cause of action is sought to be relitigated; (ii) issue
estoppel or, 'decided issue estoppel', where an issue is sought
behalf of the plaintiffs. Relitigation has been frowned upon by this court as
well as by the Supreme Court. In K.K.Modi ... Modi1 , the Supreme Court
has stated about relitigation as follows:
“44. One of the examples cited as an abuse of the process
entirety of a decided cause of action is sought to be
relitigated; (ii) issue estoppel or, "decided issue
estoppel," where an issue ... sought to be relitigated
which has been raised and decided as a fundamental step
in arriving at the earlier judicial decision; (iii) extended
or constructive
court because it is an abuse
for a party to relitigate a question or issue which has already
been decided against him even though ... examples cited as an abuse of
the process of the court is relitigation. It is an
abuse of the process of the court and contrary