Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 243 (0.66 seconds)

Kashmir Kaur vs D/O Post on 15 May, 2023

enquiry and because she had not reported the facts of her remarriage to the Pension Disbursing Authority, which is a violation of Rule ... Late Sh. Raj Kumar and has not reported the facts about her remarriage to PDA (Pension Disbursing Authority). Report further reveals that "Family Pensioner
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Brijesh Devi vs M/O Railways on 18 April, 2023

Shri Sunil Singh on 29.04.2013. She provided the said information of her remarriage to the respondents vide letter dated 19.12.2013 and 11.03.2014. Applicant states that ... getting family pension up to 13.10.2013. But, after sending information of her remarriage, respondents stopped her family pension vide impugned order dated 08.03.2014 (Annexure
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Kumar vs Minor.Thanisha on 19 October, 2023

high, more particularly, in the said situation of the remarriage. He further submitted that the first respondent is working as a teacher and she also ... children. Further, the case of the respondents that though he entered into remarriage, he is duty-bound to maintain the children born through the second
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Kumar vs Minor.Thanisha on 19 October, 2023

high, more particularly, in the said situation of the remarriage. He further submitted that the first respondent is working as a teacher and she also ... children. Further, the case of the respondents that though he entered into remarriage, he is duty-bound to maintain the children born through the second
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next