have raised serious doubts questioning the propriety and ability of the sole executor and beneficiary, Court must do something so that the properties remain intact ... there is allegations against the executor as to mismanagement and act of waste and devastation the executor cannot be removed. Executor is not like
whereby Aruna Devi and one Ram Kumar Bhuwalka were executrix and executor respectively. Shankarlal Jajodia was disinherited under the will. The assessment orders were served ... such appeal as would remove the bar of limitation on the reassessment later made on the executor who was to be regarded as an entirely
whereby Aruna Devi and one Ram Kumar Bhuwalka were executrix and executor respectively, Shankarlal Jajodia was disinherited under the will. The assessment orders were served ... such appeal as would remove the bar of limitation on the reassessment later made on the executor who was to be regarded as an entirely
other. Pandit Thakur Datta Multani had
appointed Sardar Sujan Singh as an executor of his
will. She controverted the allegation that she
and Sardar Sujan ... know of that fact, she got the name of the
plaintiff removed from the account and she opened a
fresh account in her own name
order that pending an appeal by a convicted person the executor of the sentence or order appealed against be suspended and also ... reduced by the period of remission would have had the effect of removing disqualification as the period of actual imprisonment would have been reduced
Court would naturally expect that all legitimate suspicion should be completely removed before the document is accepted as the last will of the testator ... propounder is required to remove the doubts by clear and satisfactory evidence. If the propounder succeeds in removing the suspicious circumstances the Court would grant
suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of the Will, the propounder must remove the suspicion from the mind of the Court by cogent and satisfactory evidence ... Apex Court had thought it pertinent to rely on Williams on "Executors and Administrations", Vol. I, 13th Edn., page 92 where
State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) vs Navjot Sandhu@ Afsan Guru on 4 August, 2005
The Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002
MAHARASHTRA
India
The Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act
The Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005
BIHAR
India
The Bihar Value Added Tax Act
