consequently issue
a writ of certiorari for quashing the order of repatriation
bearing No.ByuSam/Vicharane/CR-1/2016-17-Annexure 9
dated 19.05.2016, which ... herein passed order dated
19.05.2016 to the effect that his services were
repatriated to his parent department that is to the
Department of Health
informed to the second respondent that, the
services of the petitioner be repatriated with immediate effect to
enable the second respondent to take further needful ... communication, the second respondent by impugned
communication informed the third respondent to repatriate the
services of the petitioner to the second respondent to enable
absorbed: into the State
Government service or that_he_ may,--_be " repatriated back to the
parent department__ on Compietion ofeidourth year of
deputation ... order dated
H 4' as per AnneXure--A10, the petitioner was repatriated
tofthei"parent Department, Sociai Justice and Empowerment,
___"Gentral"Government
Health Inspectors in several wards, question
WPs.283-295/2016
6
regarding repatriation of services of petitioners and other
similarly placed to their parent department ... Welfare and the Directorate of Municipal Administration
to discuss the question regarding repatriation/deputation of
services of employees borrowed from other departments. In the
said
relevant portion of the Writ Petition is extracted below:
"..... For repatriation on 'SWAP' basis, the length of service of an officer outside ... Hyderabad region. Five clear vacancies are available in Karnataka itself, and 3 repatriable officers are also available for being transferred. Officers in scale-I, though
SANJAY GOWDA
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner is challenging an order of repatriation.
2. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has been
deputed ... minimum period,
the challenge in this Writ Petition to the order of
repatriation cannot be sustained.
4. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that
Army Postal Service
(APS) in the year 1997. The petitioner sought repatriation
to the respondents for personal reasons. On his
repatriation from ... Holla.A,
learned counsel for the petitioner is, when the petitioner
was repatriated to the respondents as GDS, the
respondents should have given Group
been posted in place of the petitioner and
the petitioner has been repatriated to his parent Corporation.
2. The petitioner was appointed as a Second ... vide Annexure-B, has repatriated the petitioner to
his parent Corporation. Being aggrieved by the same, the
petitioner is before this Court.
3. Learned counsel
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. The order of repatriation is challenged in this writ
petition.
2. The order of repatriation states ... short) to which she had been deputed and
hence, she was repatriated to her parent Department
ANNEXURE-C) ISSUED BY THE R-1 REPATRIATING THE PETITIONER
TO HIS PARENT DEPARTMENT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, ORDER ... dated 19.09.2024 issued by the
respondent No.1 repatriating his services to parent department.
2. The petitioner contends that he was appointed in
the department
