Gopalakrishanan Embranthiri vs Sree Mahaganapathy Deity Represented ... on 5 September, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ... PLAINTIFF 1-3, DEFENDANTS 1-3 & RECIEVER:
1. SREE MAHAGANAPATHY DEITY REPRESENTED BY VINAYAKUMAR AGED 51 YEARS
S/O INDIRAMMA ,MALIYEKKAL, PERINJANAOM DESOM
present writ petition is as to whether the property of deity
represented through Mahant can be declared escheat under Rule
356 of the Rules ... whether the properties which were exclusively belonged to the
deity represented through Mahant can be declared escheat under
Rule 356 of the Rules
name of the plaintiff-Deity out of
the Deity's fund and they cannot represent the plaintiff-Deity and they
also cannot bring ... behalf of the plaintiff-Deity and as such, the
plaintiff-Deity (Sri Bhagabat Goswami Thakur) has not been properly
represented in the suit, for which
Mandir Thikana Galta Ji Trust Through ... vs Jaipur Shahar Hindu Vikas Samiti on 22 July
Smt. Gayatri Devi W/O Late Shri ... vs Jaipur Shahar Hindu Vikas Samiti on 22
Smt. Gayatri Devi W/O Late Shri ... vs Jaipur Shahar Hindu Vikas Samiti on 22
Smt. Gayatri Devi W/O Late Shri ... vs Jaipur Shahar Hindu Vikas Samiti, ... on 22
Mandir Thikana Galta Ji Trust vs Shri Ram Das Chela Narayan Das And Ors on
Avdheshacharya vs Devasthan Commissioner And Ors on 22 July, 2024
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer
deities. The Apex Court considered that decree
against two deities has become final as no appeal was preferred to the
High Court by the deities ... against the deities as she did not represent
deities. Pertinently, the Apex Court noted that Nirmala is not seeking to
claim a more exalted right
