Article 254(1) of the Constitution and Whether the State Amendment was repugnant to the amendment made by the Central Act and that the Central ... down that if a State law relating to a concurrent subject is repugnant to a Union law relating to that subject, then, whether the Union
Constitution of India to the extent it has become inconsistent with and repugnant to the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, Central ... Constitution of India as it had been inconsistent and repugnant to the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act (Central Act 68 of 1984) amending the Land Acquisition
section 79(3) of the Tamil Nadu HR & CE Act is repugnant to Section 79(2) of the Act and also unconstitutional and also ... passage found in para 8 for the proposition that there is no repugnancy between the HR & CE Act and Transfer of Property
State Law providing for the issues covered by the Central Law was repugnant to the Central Law and they were held to be unconstitutional ... empowered to make laws on the same subject, the possibility of repugnancy between a law made by Parliament and a law made by a State
Schedule VII of the Constitution can be held to be repugnant to the State
legislation made under an entry in List II of Schedule ... both can operate
in their respective fields. The question of any apparent repugnancy does not
arise for this Court to hold that the Central legislation
main part of clause (2) of Article 254 , the State legislation being repugnant to the Central legislation, the same would be inoperative.
(iv) Whether ... State law encroaches upon Entry 66 of the Union List or is repugnant to the law made by the Centre under Entry
will hold the field and these Rules are not repugnant to the Rules of 1974. The Rules of 1974 only laid down that every fourth ... language is clear and unqualified, the subsequent General Rules would prevail despite repugnancy. If the intention of the rule-making authority is to sweep away
statute, it is not necessary again to consider the vires or repugnancy of Section 9 of the Act with Section ... said Act. The question of the State Act being repugnant to the Central Act cannot be urged in view of the fact that Presidential assent
regard to any disciplinary action. In that case, the question of any repugnancy between a State Act (the Madhya Pradesh State Cooperative Societies
petitioner argued at length, on the basis of the Agama principles being repugnant to allowing archanas to be performed in Tamil at the request
