provision of a law made by the Legislature of a State is repugnant to any provision of a law made by Parliament which Parliament ... Legislature of the State shall, to the extent of the repugnancy, be void.
(2) Where a law made by the Legislature of a State with
contention that the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act of 1949 is repugnant to, and inconsistent with the fundamental right of any Indian citizen ... Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act even though the same is repugnant to Article 19(I)(d) , will have to be considered. In passing, reference
Article 254(1) of the Constitution and Whether the State Amendment was repugnant to the amendment made by the Central Act and that the Central ... down that if a State law relating to a concurrent subject is repugnant to a Union law relating to that subject, then, whether the Union
State law encroaches upon Entry 66 of the Union List or is repugnant to the law made by the Centre Under Entry ... requiring prior permission of the State Government for establishing a college is repugnant to Section 10A inserted in the Indian Medical Council
State law encroaches upon Entry 66 of the Union List or is repugnant to the law made by the Centre under Entry ... Charitable Trust -vs- State of Tamil Nadu (supra), the question was of repugnancy between the provisions of the Indian Medical Council
rules framed thereunder have become void and unenforceable as being repugnant to the Constitution.
In C. M. P. No. 13169 of 1950 the facts ... Malabar and his contention is that the Act and the Rules are repugnant to the Constitution and have become void & that accordingly a writ
Highways Act, 2001 .
41.10. Hence, the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001, is repugnant to the
Central Act, namely, the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency ... Constitution of India, the Tamil
Nadu Highways Act would become repugnant.
43.4. This Court, in the judgment in R.Moorthy v. State of Tamil Nadu
ORDER
Whether, the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 is
repugnant to the Central Enactment, namely Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ,
whether the provisions ... focussed his arguments,
mainly on the following issues:
(i) Repugnancy of the State Act with the Central Act;
(ii) Competency of District Revenue Officer
punished.
24. Mr.Shakespeare, learned counsel for the petitioner would argue
on repugnancy. He would contend that when the Tamilnadu Recognised
Private Schools (Regulation ... Bench is received.
(b)Extensive arguments were made on the question of repugnancy of
the notification in the light of Sections
State law made under Entry 25 of List III would be repugnant to any law made by Parliament under Entry 66 of List ... State Legislature is competent to enact under the said entry and repugnancy if any with Central Legislation can be cured by taking recourse to Article
