Smt. Aparna Mishra vs State Of Chhattisgarh 36 Wa/17/2017 ... on 7 December, 2018
Smt. Aparna Mishra vs State Of Chhattisgarh 36 Wa/17/2017 ... on 7 December, 2018
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (1.53 seconds)Chandra Prakash Jangde And Anr vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors on 19 September, 2022
reservation policy which is not changed by the impugned amendment. It is
pleaded that the revised reservation policy is constitutionally valid and the
same ... misused while breaching the
ceiling limit of 50% reservation and the respondents have made the
reservation proportionate to the population which cannot be sustained
Ll Koshley And Ors vs State Of C.G. Ors on 19 September, 2022
reservation policy which is not changed by the impugned amendment. It is
pleaded that the revised reservation policy is constitutionally valid and the
same ... misused while breaching the
ceiling limit of 50% reservation and the respondents have made the
reservation proportionate to the population which cannot be sustained
Aparna Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 19 September, 2022
reservation policy which is not changed by the impugned amendment. It is
pleaded that the revised reservation policy is constitutionally valid and the
same ... misused while breaching the
ceiling limit of 50% reservation and the respondents have made the
reservation proportionate to the population which cannot be sustained
Dr. Rajesh Baghel vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors on 19 September, 2022
reservation policy which is not changed by the impugned amendment. It is
pleaded that the revised reservation policy is constitutionally valid and the
same ... misused while breaching the
ceiling limit of 50% reservation and the respondents have made the
reservation proportionate to the population which cannot be sustained
Guru Ghasidas Sahitya Avam Sans.Acad vs State Of C.G. And Anr on 19 September, 2022
reservation policy which is not changed by the impugned amendment. It is
pleaded that the revised reservation policy is constitutionally valid and the
same ... misused while breaching the
ceiling limit of 50% reservation and the respondents have made the
reservation proportionate to the population which cannot be sustained
P.R. Khute And Anr vs State Of C.G. And Ors on 19 September, 2022
reservation policy which is not changed by the impugned amendment. It is
pleaded that the revised reservation policy is constitutionally valid and the
same ... misused while breaching the
ceiling limit of 50% reservation and the respondents have made the
reservation proportionate to the population which cannot be sustained
Chhattisgarh Anusuchit Jati/Janjati ... vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr on 19 September, 2022
reservation policy which is not changed by the impugned amendment. It is
pleaded that the revised reservation policy is constitutionally valid and the
same ... misused while breaching the
ceiling limit of 50% reservation and the respondents have made the
reservation proportionate to the population which cannot be sustained
Vivek Kumar Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 19 September, 2022
reservation policy which is not changed by the impugned amendment. It is
pleaded that the revised reservation policy is constitutionally valid and the
same ... misused while breaching the
ceiling limit of 50% reservation and the respondents have made the
reservation proportionate to the population which cannot be sustained
Arun Kumar Pathak And Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr on 19 September, 2022
reservation policy which is not changed by the impugned amendment. It is
pleaded that the revised reservation policy is constitutionally valid and the
same ... misused while breaching the
ceiling limit of 50% reservation and the respondents have made the
reservation proportionate to the population which cannot be sustained