Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 291 (1.85 seconds)

Mahkar Singh vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghthan on 14 September, 2020

submitted another letter of resignation on 11.12.2009. It is stated that though the respondents accepted his resignation, they did not treat it as technical resignation ... acceptance of the resignation, and ultimately, it was accepted on 26.03.2010. It is also stated that the question of acceptance of technical resignation would arise
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Tara Bai vs M/O Railways on 3 March, 2020

that since his applications for voluntary retirements are not being accepted, he tenders his resignation w.e.f. 30.11.2006. The same was accepted by respondents ... When the same was not accepted as he did not have 20 years of qualifying service, he tendered his resignation which was accepted
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neeraj Madhav vs All India Radio on 17 February, 2020

resignation was accepted by the appropriate authority in consonance with the rules governing the acceptance, the public servant concerned has locus poenitentiae but not thereafter ... action taken on the letter of resignation may justify an inference that resignation had not been accepted. But in the facts of the instant case
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gautam Prakash vs Allahabad Bank on 4 December, 2020

Applicant has requested for Technical Resignation in his resignation dated 24.08.2017 why the technical resignation was not accepted, information may be provided. vii. Copy ... application of Technical Resignation dated 24.07.2017. viii. Information may be provided that why the applicant was asked for another normal resignation even after
Central Information Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Chandra - Full Document

Manjula S vs E.S.I.C. on 4 March, 2020

written submission the applicants say that they did not accept the terms and conditions in the draft attached to the letter dated 9.10.2003 and that ... from 1/1/2006? If so, whether the technical resignation submitted by them can be accepted by the Govt. Of Karnataka with effect from
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J Saraladevi vs E.S.I.C. on 4 March, 2020

written submission the applicants say that they did not accept the terms and conditions in the draft attached to the letter dated 9.10.2003 and that ... from 1/1/2006? If so, whether the technical resignation submitted by them can be accepted by the Govt. Of Karnataka with effect from
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shanthala M B vs E.S.I.C. on 4 March, 2020

written submission the applicants say that they did not accept the terms and conditions in the draft attached to the letter dated 9.10.2003 and that ... from 1/1/2006? If so, whether the technical resignation submitted by them can be accepted by the Govt. Of Karnataka with effect from
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next