Committee of the appellant-School accepted the resignation submitted by the
First Respondent on 19.03.1997. Acceptance of the said resignation was,
however, subject ... resignation prior to 16.06.1997.
16. Resignation submitted by the First Respondent could be withdrawn by
him before its acceptance. Such acceptance of resignation
only in absence of such a provision prospective resignation can be withdrawn before
its acceptance. It was further submitted that as each of the employees ... laid down the law that an offer of resignation can
be withdrawn before the same is accepted. According to the learned counsel, the
matter relating
regulations, may be accepted or may not be accepted as it is
subject to express approval of the employer whereas a resignation
becomes effective upon ... offer of voluntary retirement
may be accepted or may not be accepted but such is a case of resignation
also particularly when the concerned employee
said purported offer of resignation of the respondent was accepted on 24-7-1999 stating:
Your resignation as Registrar is accepted in the afternoon ... being the appropriate
authority for accepting the resignation, the 2nd appellant had no authority to accept the same, having not been questioned, the writ petition
doubt whatsoever that the petitioner's letter of resignation was not legally accepted and thus he continued in service ... merits, we find that the Managing Committee could not have accepted the letter of resignation said to have been submitted by the writ petitioner. This
Agriculture Service, category I, submitted his resignation by letter dated 1-11-1956. The said resignation was not accepted for a long time. The petitioner ... that although the petitioner submitted his resignation with effect from 1-11-1967, the same was not accepted for a long time. The petitioner filed
were also made accused. The appellant did not
issue any cheque. He, as noticed hereinbefore, had
resigned from the Directorship of the Company ... exactly on what date the said resignation
was accepted by the Company is not known, but, even
otherwise, there is no averment in the complaint
that the appellant had not
disclosed as to when the resignation purported to have been submitted by
him was accepted by the Company ... exactly on what date the said resignation was accepted by the Company is
not known, but, even otherwise, there is no averment in the complaint
notice or resignation given by
such an officer before or during the disciplinary
proceedings shall not take effect unless it is
accepted by the competent ... notice or resignation given by such
an officer before or during the disciplinary proceedings shall not take effect
unless it is accepted by the competent
were also made accused. The appellant did not
issue any cheque. He, as noticed hereinbefore, had
resigned from the Directorship of the Company ... exactly on what date the said resignation
was accepted by the Company is not known, but, even
otherwise, there is no averment in the complaint
