Delhi Administration vs Yogender Singh on 6 December, 1996
payment; 2. Compensatory and allowances; 3. Hours of work and rest intervals; 4. Leave with wages and holidays; 5. Bonus, profit sharing, provident fund
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 637 (0.75 seconds)Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. & Ors. vs Mahender Kumar on 24 May, 2016
payment; (ii) compensatory
and other allowances; (iii) hours of work and rest intervals; (iv) leave
with wages and holidays; (v) bonus, profit sharing, provident fund
Lahori Singh vs Larsen & Toubro Ltd. on 9 December, 1996
payment; 2.Compensatory and allowances; 3.Hours of work and rest intervals; 4.Leave with wages and holidays; 5.Bonus, profit sharing, provident fund
Indian Railway Finance Corp. Ltd. vs Rajendra Prasad & Others on 1 May, 2013
Indian Railway Finance Corp. Ltd. vs Rajendra Prasad & Others on 1 May, 2013
Author
Chandra Prakash Tiwari & Anr vs M/S Padmini Technologies Ltd. on 1 July, 2019
payment;
2. Compensatory and other allowances;
3. Hours of work and rest intervals;
4. Leave with wages and holidays;
5. Bonus, profit sharing, provident fund
Union Of India & Anr vs Shri Rk Nim on 6 November, 2024
Finance
Minister himself. Even review of suspension at quarterly/half-
yearly interval rests with the Finance Minister. This is so, as
suspension during contemplation/pendency
Kanhaya Lal vs The Management Of M/S Swantantra Bharat ... on 21 March, 2016
force ;
3. Compensatory and other allowances ;
4. Hours of work and rest intervals;
5. Leave with wages and holidays ;
6. Starting alteration or discontinuance
Shubh Karan Jagnani vs State on 26 May, 1970
work displayed from 1.30 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. with rest interval from 5.30 p.m. to 6. p.m.) (1) Manohar Lal .........Weaver ... factory.) ft is stated that in this case the workers rest-period was between 530 p.m. to 6 p.m The Factory Inspector, found
Kanhaya Lal vs The Management Of M/S Swantantra Bharat ... on 25 May, 2017
force;
3. Compensatory and other allowances;
4. Hours of work and rest intervals;
5. Leave with wages and holidays;
6. Starting alteration or discontinuance
Agan Lal vs Kapuri Devi on 24 September, 1973
relation to his business and (p) for his rest and for lunch during lunch interval, the appellant would be deemed to have been residing ... residence of the employee or for lunch and rest during lunch interval, by the appellant are false and no case has been made