litigation and tried to revive the
proceedings by making an application for restoration
in an appeal which was decided by the Appellate
Authority under ... under consideration.
20. The question, as to whether the restoration
application should have been allowed or not, was gone
into by the Courts below
filed by Smt. Beena Kumari got dismissed
for non-prosecution and application for restoration of
the suit also failed. On 28.06.2010, Rajiv Singh
Hanspal ... Beena Kumari Mehra got dismissed in default on
26.03.1986 and an application for restoration of the
suit was also dismissed for default
Additional Senior Civil Judge, Surat,
and submitted that after filing the application for restoration
of the suit, the appellant-plaintiff remained present in almost ... plaintiff was not interested in pursuing the restoration
application. As pointed out earlier, application for
restoration of the suit filed by the appellant-plaintiff
filing the application for recall.
3.6.4. Being aggrieved by such dismissal of the appeal and the application
for restoration, the appellant preferred a revision petition14 ... exacting where the appeal was dismissed in default and
then, the application for restoration was dismissed with a hyper-technical view
of the matter
Canara Bank, however, returned the cheque vide letter
dated 10.02.1994, demanding the restoration and
registration of the bonds.
2.11. Canara Bank filed W.P. (Civil ... Depositories Act,
1996 .
2.14. Canara Bank filed an application for
Restoration of the Writ Petition, which was restored vide
Order dated 12.05.1999.
2.15. Canara Bank
Authority, therefore, filed an
application before the Appellate Court praying for
recall of the order dated 25.04.2014 and sought
restoration of their appeal ... myriad reasons, the Court could
have imposed some cost on them for restoration of
their appeal to compensate the respondent(plaintiff)
instead of depriving them
respondent No. 10 due to
non-submission of requisite information and the application thereof
was rejected in November, 2012. Despite the rejection, respondent ... application filed
by respondents 1 to 3 was not an application simplicitor under Section
14 of the Act. It was an application where a specific
view of this transaction, upon restoration of the suit,
the said purchasers moved an application (IA No. 135 of 2002) for being
impleaded as plaintiffs
error apparent on the face of record and consequently
allowed the application for review, recalled the Order dated 19 th
October, 2012 and set aside ... Order dated 31 st
March, 2006 passed in miscellaneous application and for
restoration of Writ Petition No. 18500(W) of 1985 to be heard
with the
respondents than to file an application under Section 151 CPC
before the High Court for restoration of possession of the subject
property ... submission of the learned counsel for the appellant that
execution application under Section 144 CPC would lie only before
the Court of first instance, which
