annexure No. 2). Against the order dated 25.5.2015, two restoration applications were filed:-
(i) Restoration application dated 15.6.2015 filed on behalf of the State ... remedy of restoration under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC , therefore, the period of pendency of the restoration application should be treated
revision, vide order dated 28.06.2021, filed against the order dismissing the restoration application, without considering the merits of the restoration application and without affording ... Revenue), Mirzapur. Against the order of dismissal-in-default, highly belated restoration application dated 27.11.2003 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) has been moved
operation of the earlier order dated 30.01.2013 on the belated restoration application filed by contesting respondents.
Present writ petition is arising out of proceeding under ... respondent no.4) and Shiva Pujan (respondent no.5) have filed restoration application dated 20.10.2015 against the order dated 30.01.2013 claiming their right and title
application.
Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection to the delay condonation application.
Cause shown in the delay condonation application in filing the restoration ... application is sufficient.
Delay condonation application is allowed. Delay in filing restoration application is condoned. The restoration application shall be heard on merits.
Order Date
dismissed for non-prosecution on 5 September 2008. A restoration application came to be filed after four years on 5 October 2012. Against the restoration ... petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent submits that the restoration application was filed belatedly after four years; petitioner was contesting parallel civil proceedings
decided expeditiously.
8. By the order dated 07.12.2016, the restoration application 4-C under Order 9, Rule 13 C.P.C of the defendant ... application was allowed. Moreover, this application 14-C was made after filing of the application under Order 9, Rule 13 on 24.05.2014 when the application
want of prosecution on 12.7.2001.
The office has reported that a restoration application seeking for recall of the order dated 12.7.2001 had been filed ... section concerned. The order sheet does not indicate that the said restoration application had been decided. The office has, therefore, collected the photo copy
Consolidation, Gorakhpur (in brevity "D.D.C."), rejecting the restoration application filed by petitioners against order dated 22.11.2018 (Annexure-7) passed ... Consolidation (in brevity "S.O.C.") in rejecting the restoration application moved by the petitioners against the order dated 11.04.2005 (Annexure-4) passed
published on 02.04.2014. The learned labour court dismissed the restoration application by the impugned order dated 27.01.2017 solely on the footing that the same ... been filed after 30 days.
4. The validity of a restoration application filed after a period of 30 days was examined in M/s Haryana
passed by Consolidation Officer(in brevity "C.O.") in restoration application moved by the private respondent No.3 against the earlier order dated ... dated 24.11.1978. At subsequent stage, after lapse of 35 years a restoration application dated 14.09.2016 was preferred on behalf of the present petitioners against
