Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 773 (1.46 seconds)

Shri Rakesh Kumar vs The Union Of India Through on 12 April, 2012

should be continued in office indefinitely, i.e, for long periods awaiting the result of criminal proceedings. It is not in the interest of administration ... persons accused of serious misdemeanour should be continued in office indefinitely awaiting the result of criminal proceedings.. 21. In another case, namely, Depot Manager, Andhra
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ms. Ruma Das vs Kendriya Vidalaya Sangathan on 4 April, 2011

should be continued in office indefinitely, i.e, for long periods awaiting the result of criminal proceedings. It is not in the interest of administration ... persons accused of serious misdemeanour should be continued in office indefinitely awaiting the result of criminal proceedings.. 21. In another case, namely, Depot Manager, Andhra
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next