time of the settlement. If, it was included, the right of resumption would be with the Zemindar, if not, he would not have that right ... that when the services are proved to be personal, the right of resumption, if it exists, vests in the Zemindar. This is the presumption that
time of the settlement. If it was included, the right of resumption would be with the zemindar, it not, he would not have the right ... that when the services are proved to be personal, the right of resumption, if it exists vests in the. zemindar. This is the presumption that
that unless the Government had at the time of resumption no right to resume the first defendant has no case; that is to say, that
inam. That suit was dismissed on the ground that the right of resumption was not in the Zemindar but in the Government and that
that unless the Government had at the time of resumption no right to resume, the first defendant has no case; that is to say that
Court of Wards, who are in charge of this estate, directed the resumption of the inam under Exhibit A on the 24th January
