petitioners calling upon them to show cause why action for resumption should not be taken under clause 4 of the agreement. The petitioners gave their ... resumed on 25-7-1995 at 11.00 a.m. and on such resumption, forfeiture clauses 4 and 11 will become operative. Petitioners again sought extension
first is that we should quash the order of resumption. The second is that we should quash the demand for the payment of the sums ... next question is whether we should quash the order of resumption which was made on October 24, 1967. It is clear that that order
Assistant Commissioner and had annulled the sale
transaction and directed the resumption of the land by the
State and restitution to the original grantee.
Subsequently ... Assistant
Commissioner to take possession of the lands by way of
resumption. Thereafter, notice on 02.12.2011 was issued.
It is the order of the Deputy
filed by the respondent. However, the wife contended
that there was no resumption of marital life even after
the confirmation of the decree for restitution ... after the judgment of this Court or that her
efforts to ensure resumption of cohabitation were either
obstructed or thwarted by the husband. The family
Rule 25 of the KLG Rules and cancellation of grant and resumption of lands in its favour and to restore the same in favour ... favour of inamdars. According to the learned Sr. Counsel, the cancellation and resumption of sites in favour of the inamdars is totally impermissible
that if the plaintiff
was not present at the schedule property the resumption
would be done in their absence.
m) That the said order ... give any
justification for non-utilization. As such, the order of
resumption was passed. The action taken before the expiry
of 90 days would
concluding that a tenancy
created by a joint family is valid for resumption by a soldier.
The Act limits such rights exclusively to tenancies created ... that the fourth respondent, as a joint family
-
12
member, could claim resumption is contrary to the scheme
of the Act and the legislative intent
possession. In the year 2025, respondent No.4 filed an
application seeking resumption under Sections 4 and 5 of
the PTCL Act. The Assistant Commissioner ... years.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the application for resumption was not filed by the original
grantee but by respondent
possession. In the year 2025, respondent No.4 filed an
application seeking resumption under Sections 4 and 5 of
the PTCL Act. The Assistant Commissioner ... years.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the application for resumption was not filed by the original
grantee but by respondent
Deputy
Commissioner contending that they had no notice of
the resumption proceedings.
33. However, in the interregnum, on 02.03.2015, i.e.,
about 6 months ... order of resumption passed
by the Assistant Commissioner, Gowramma and
Bylamma made an application seeking permission
