resumption order, a notice was pasted on the wall of the tenanted house when he was not living there. The order of resumption proceeded ... passes orders in relation to property which was 'so sold'. In other words, the order of resumption can only be attracted
question to any
other person on the basis of the resumption order, if any,
or otherwise. Though there was no prayer regarding any
resumption order ... asserted that the resumption
order, if any passed by the defendant was void, illegal,
non-est and not binding upon the plaintiff in any manner
argue afresh on merits of resumption
but he could not point out any invalidity in the resumption
order. Accordingly, the resumption was upheld. Even ... have not,
the order passed by this Court would not be of any help to
the appellants. The order of resumption would stand upheld
order dated 21.06.2001 was served
upon the petitioners and, as such, the order of resumption is bad in law.
Further, according to the learned senior ... appellate
authority, in order dated 31.03.2009 (Annexure P-8), have observed in quite
unambiguous manner that the notices and order of resumption were sent
opportunity of
personal hearing was granted. By an order dated 7.3.2005, an order of
resumption was issued. However, despite the same, letters were written ... High Court by its order dated
28.7.2006, allowed the said Writ Petition and quashed the order of
resumption.
Respondent had already appointed an architect
ordered by the Estate Officer vide his order dated 11.2 1975 Annexure P-1, and subsequently modified by the Chief Administrator vide order Annexure ... order of the Chief Administrator Annexure P-2 or the order dated 20.12.1979 of the Chief Commissioner, Chandigarh, upholding the orders Annexures
plaintiffs had sufficient notice of the resumption. They adopted certain remedies to get rid of the resumption order but they were not successful. It cannot ... order of the resumption made by the Collector. It is clear from the record that after the resumption order, the Tahsildar had made
ordered to be forfeited. On appeal, the Chief Administrator, HUDA, passed an order dated October 26, 1981 (P.8) setting aside the order of resumption ... failed to do so, the order dated February 23, 1982 was passed ordering the resumption of the plot. A perusal of this order, which
resumption, as also the appellate and revisional orders, upholding the resumption order of the Estate Officer, on the ground that since the misuser ... misuser has been stopped, the ground for resumption does not exist any more and the resumption order is liable to be set aside
dated 30.12.2019 does not contemplate
resumption of lands assigned to landless poor. Therefore, the
impugned resumption order is contrary ... such orders, the provisions in BSO 15 relating to
the orders of the assignment shall apply also to the orders relating to
resumption. As such
