pass orders afresh. Till then, the petitioners
therein shall not be evicted.
xiv. In compliance of the said order, the RDO, Chevella
passed order dated ... Chevella passed
resumption orders. Vide order dated 30.04.2008, this Court set
16
aside the resumption proceedings dated 16.11.2002 of RDO,
Chevella imposed costs
Court.
However, vide order dated 25.05.1993, the Estate Officer, HUDA,
Panchkula, ordered for the resumption of the plot owing to non payment
of the installments ... revised price of the site, the
authorities, vide order dated 20.03.2002 (Annexure P5),
ordered its resumption. Needless to assert, as a consequence,
the contract between
Court.
However, vide order dated 25.05.1993, the Estate Officer, HUDA,
Panchkula, ordered for the resumption of the plot owing to non payment
of the installments ... revised price of the site, the
authorities, vide order dated 20.03.2002 (Annexure P5),
ordered its resumption. Needless to assert, as a consequence,
the contract between
Plot No. 2 through an order dated 07.05.2004. This
resumption order was later quashed by this Court in W.P. No.
21984/2004 ... petitioner's
replies to the show-cause notices preceding the resumption order
were not properly considered. The Court also directed the Board to
reconsider
orders of resumption are extracted herein below for
ready reference.
6. The Resumption Order dated 13.02.2018 is as follows:-
"ESTATE OFFICER
OFFICE: HUDA, SECTOR ... respectively. The
appeals against the orders of resumption were
allowed but the resumption orders were upheld in
the revision in both the said cases. Though
given before
resumption in pursuance of the relevant clause of the lease
deed.
13. However, despite such objection, the impugned resumption
order was passed ... upon by resumption of the
property.
34. As such, even proceeding on the premise of the facts recorded in
the impugned resumption order, the subsequent
given before
resumption in pursuance of the relevant clause of the lease
deed.
13. However, despite such objection, the impugned resumption
order was passed ... upon by resumption of the
property.
34. As such, even proceeding on the premise of the facts recorded in
the impugned resumption order, the subsequent
passed the
order dated 22.05.2023, which is impugned in this
writ petition, and allowed the appeal and set aside
the order of resumption. The Deputy ... under the PTCL Act .
49. Being aggrieved by this order reversing the order of
resumption, these writ petitions are filed by H.R.
Suresh
passed the
order dated 22.05.2023, which is impugned in this
writ petition, and allowed the appeal and set aside
the order of resumption. The Deputy ... under the PTCL Act .
49. Being aggrieved by this order reversing the order of
resumption, these writ petitions are filed by H.R.
Suresh
passed the
order dated 22.05.2023, which is impugned in this
writ petition, and allowed the appeal and set aside
the order of resumption. The Deputy ... under the PTCL Act .
49. Being aggrieved by this order reversing the order of
resumption, these writ petitions are filed by H.R.
Suresh
