Forming Society
('CJFS') & Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati. The order of resumption
was passed that the land mentioned in the schedule thereto ... land under the L.A. Act, 1894 .
iii) The resumption order dated 23.09.2008 was not interfered with;
iv) The orders were passed for grant
Forming Society
('CJFS') & Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati. The order of resumption
was passed that the land mentioned in the schedule thereto ... land under the L.A. Act, 1894 .
iii) The resumption order dated 23.09.2008 was not interfered with;
iv) The orders were passed for grant
Forming Society
('CJFS') & Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati. The order of resumption
was passed that the land mentioned in the schedule thereto ... land under the L.A. Act, 1894 .
iii) The resumption order dated 23.09.2008 was not interfered with;
iv) The orders were passed for grant
Forming Society
('CJFS') & Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati. The order of resumption
was passed that the land mentioned in the schedule thereto ... land under the L.A. Act, 1894 .
iii) The resumption order dated 23.09.2008 was not interfered with;
iv) The orders were passed for grant
allotted or restored to the same
allottee because the resumption order regarding
the plot had attained finality. He further opined
that if however the provisions ... absence of any provision to challenge the appellate order,
dated 03.01.1995, confirming the order of resumption/cancellation against
the AJL, the so called order dated
allotted or restored to the same
allottee because the resumption order regarding
the plot had attained finality. He further opined
that if however the provisions ... absence of any provision to challenge the appellate order,
dated 03.01.1995, confirming the order of resumption/cancellation against
the AJL, the so called order dated
dismissed for
default. On July 19, 2023, a second resumption order under Section 4(2)
was passed by the appellant-authorities, against which a representation ... resumption could not take place. Upon the said writ petition being
dismissed for default on June 21, 2023, the second resumption order
was passed
order dated
15.01.2020.
3. In terms of above order of Apex Court, the OP No.3,
vide Order No.280 dated 31.01.2020 permitted resumption ... itself
directed grant of resumption of Lease and in furtherance
thereof, the OPs have issued Resumption Order. As a
corollary of this, Petitioners have
order dated
15.01.2020.
3. In terms of above order of Apex Court, the OP No.3,
vide Order No.280 dated 31.01.2020 permitted resumption ... itself
directed grant of resumption of Lease and in furtherance
thereof, the OPs have issued Resumption Order. As a
corollary of this, Petitioners have
dismissed for
default. On July 19, 2023, a second resumption order under Section 4(2)
was passed by the appellant-authorities, against which a representation ... resumption could not take place. Upon the said writ petition being
dismissed for default on June 21, 2023, the second resumption order
was passed
