hired
on retainership basis by the defendant company as per the terms
& conditions of the Retainership Contract Ex.PW1/A.
Therefore, only ... plaintiff is entitled for salary/ retainership fee w.e.f. April 2008
till 04.07.2008 in terms of retainership contract Ex.PW1/A.
Thus
plaintiff is demanding the amount from the period
of the retainership contract which was renewed from 1st April, 2007 to
31st March, 2008 with retainer ... annum as the defendant could not have terminated
the retainership contract on 18th May, 2007, i.e. the entire amount for
the contractual period
Appellant had not only gone back from
entering into the further retainership contract but had also entered into
competitive business during the course ... signing the
Retainership Agreement although you had agreed
towards the same.
You have unilaterally decided to not to sign the
Retainership contract with Mercados which
Attorney in the favour
of Mandeep Singh.
Ex.PW-1/2: Retainership contract between plaintiff
and defendant ... against the said retainership agreement, it was for the
defendants to show or prove that they have terminated the said
retainership contract.
13. As discussed
relied upon following
documents:
i. Retainership Contract dated 24.01.2011 Ex. PW1/1.
ii. Computer generated copy of letter dated ... company under a retainership contract and he continued
services for extended period without renewal of contract or substitution of
contract. Hence, it is clear that
said letter, the terms
and conditions were that the "Retainership Contract" shall be for a
period of two years starting from 15th ... granted that remuneration and that letter has referred "Extension
of Retainership Contract". The next submission of the learned AR
is that the assessee
nothing due to him against the management,
as alleged; that his retainership contract was terminated w.e.f.
13.12.2011 as per terms and conditions ... retainership contract with
management dated 06.05.2005. Lastly, a prayer was made to dismiss his
statement of claim.
6. In the rejoinder filed
breeder seed development.
vi. Foreign patent filing expenditure.
vii. Consultancy expenditure, retainership, contract manpower / labour.
viii. Building maintenance, Municipal taxes and rental charges being paid
Strides Arcolab Ltd, Navi Mumbai vs Dcit Cir 15(3)(2), Mumbai on 23 May
apply to persons engaged on daily rated, part
time, casual, contract, retainership basis and apprentice / trainees, etc.
Clause-1.1 of both the settlement read thus ... excludes persons engaged on Daily Rated,
Part Time, Casual, Contract, Retainership basis and Apprentice /
Trainees, etc.
However, this defence was not raised before the learned
