accused-revisionist for exercising his right for getting the sample retested by the Central Food Laboratory. It is further submitted that Section ... thus the valuable right of the accused for getting the sample retested at the Central Food Laboratory gets defeated. Even P.W.1, the Food
valuable rights of the revisionist of getting the sample retested by the Central Food Laboratory is defeated. It is further submitted that the said question ... right under Section 13(2) of the Act for getting the sample retested by the Central Food Laboratory. This is a fact which is even
notice upon the accused renders his valuable right of getting the sample retested by the Central Food Laboratory to be defeated. It is submitted that ... valuable right of getting the sample retested by the Central Food Laboratory stand defeated. The prosecution has thus to fail and is thus held defeated
been served on the revisionist his valuable right of getting the sample retested at the Central Food Laboratory gets defeated and the prosecution thus deserves ... with the present matter, it is apparent that the Food Inspector took sample of mixed milk from a can which is alleged to be carried
received by the revisionist his valuable rights to get the sample retested by the Central Food Laboratory is defeated. The fact that the report under
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for getting the sample of the alleged item retested by the Central Food Laboratory after receipt ... notice under the said section and then applying for getting sample retested, is totally vague inasmuch as Yogesh Kumar Pundir
call whether he wants to get the sample as is remaining with the concerned authority be retested at the Central Food Laboratory ... against the said provision and his right defeats for getting the sample retested by the Central Food Laboratory.
10. Looking to the grave irregularity
Bajpai, Food Inspector, was examined as PW-1. He states of taking sample of goat milk from container allegedly belonging to the revisionist ... prejudiced as he did not get a chance to get the sample retested in the Central Food Laboratory, as such his valuable right under Section
prejudiced as he did not get a chance to get the sample retested in the Central Food Laboratory, as such his valuable right under Section
sent to the revisionist, his valuable right for getting the sample retested by CFL, is violated. It is argued that the prosecution is thus liable ... fail inasmuch as the valuable right to the accused of getting sample retested under Section 13(2) of the PFA Act has been defeated
