Supreme Court has observed:-
"The demand of the respondent for retesting of samples was declined but in order to obviate any unfair treatment ... reasons, namely, (1) Rejection of the request of the respondent for retesting the samples on the ground that there is no such provision
Supreme Court has observed:-
"The demand of the respondent for retesting of samples was declined but in order to obviate any unfair treatment ... reasons, namely, (1) Rejection of the request of the respondent for retesting the samples on the ground that there is no such provision
Supreme Court has
observed:-
"The demand of the respondent for retesting of samples was declined
but in order to obviate any unfair treatment ... reasons, namely, (1) Rejection of the request of the respondent
for retesting the samples on the ground that there is no such provision
produce the same before the learned IV Metropolitan
Magistrate, Saidapet for retesting of sample under Section 25(4) of the Act.
The accused vide letter ... Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet for
taking steps to send for retesting the sample under Section 25(4) of the Act.
The letter dated
samples taken from the imported materials, there is no need for sending the samples taken from the imported consignments once again for retesting. Supporting ... retest fee. Requests for such retest should normally be complied with. Such retests should, however, be made only on the remnants of the samples originally
failure of the Complainant to take measures to send the sample for retesting well within time, the valuable right of the Accused (Respondents) to prove ... Complainant (Petitioner/Appellant) to take measures to send the samples for retesting well within the time, the accrued valuable rights of the Respondents/Accused
failure of the Complainant to take measures to send the sample for retesting well within time, the valuable right of the Accused (Respondents) to prove ... Complainant (Petitioner/Appellant) to take measures to send the samples for retesting well within the time, the Respondents/Accused had lost their accrued valuable rights
petitioner again submitted their submissions on
12.10.2017. They requested that the sample be retested under
Section 25(4) of the Drugs and Cosmetics ... samples failed the quality test and the 4th sample was found to
be spurious. The 4th sample was again tested and it was again
contesting respondents had a right to have fresh samples drawn
and get the same retested within seven days of intimation of the
test results ... application
before the trial court in the said suit for fresh sampling/retest of
the products. Though an objection was raised for filing counter-
statement
getting the samples retested and if retest has been done,
the second report or the report obtained after the retest takes precedence
over the first ... court. Therefore, if at all the accused can get the
samples retested, it is only after 08.06.1999 he could do so by filing an
application
