practice with the reason ‘sanction expired’.
The respondent-employer neither paid retrenchment compensation nor issued
any notice or paid wages in lieu of the same ... Therefore, termination of his contract is a clear case of retrenchment as
opposed to the provision in Section
Trade Union Act, 1926 . A letter
dated 27.07.1992, purportedly a notice of retrenchment together with the
statement of reasons enclosed therewith was served upon approximately ... MRTU & PULP Act "), in proposing to retrench the
concerned workmen. It has assailed the legality and validity of the notice
of retrenchment served
appellant-workman would be entitled to consolidated
damages/compensation equivalent to the retrenchment compensation calculated
from the date of his engagement till the date ... appellant-workman was entitled to consolidated damages/compensation
equivalent to the retrenchment compensation calculated from the date of the
workmen’s engagement till the date
Labour
Court after adjudication of the points of dispute held that the
retrenchment of the appellant-workman (for short "the workman") from ... sanctioned post with effect from 1.1.1987 till his
services came to be retrenched, i.e. on 1.4.1992 and has rendered service
of more than
ground that the
appellant, who was a driver, had been retrenched from his services by the
respondent-Managing Committee, DAV Public School by following ... respondent-Managing Committee in its meeting dated 24.08.2002, passed a
resolution to retrench the services of the two junior most surplus drivers,
namely the appellant
proceeds to hold that, the termination of workmen do not amount to retrenchment in terms of Section 2(oo) of the Act as the case ... termination of the services of the petitioners would not amount to retrenchment and therefore, the question of complying with Section 25-F , clauses
Trade Union Act, 1926 . A letter
dated 27.07.1992, purportedly a notice of
retrenchment together with the statement of
reasons enclosed therewith was served upon
approximately ... hereinafter referred to as
the “ MRTU & PULP Act ”), in proposing to retrench
the concerned workmen. It has assailed the
legality and validity
ground that the appellant, who was a driver, had
been retrenched from his services by the
respondent-Managing Committee, DAV Public School
by following ... respondent-Managing Committee in its meeting
dated 24.08.2002, passed a resolution to retrench
the services of the two junior most surplus
drivers, namely the appellant
appellant-workman would be
entitled to consolidated damages/compensation
equivalent to the retrenchment compensation
calculated from the date of his engagement till the
date ... appellant-workman was entitled to consolidated
damages/compensation equivalent to the retrenchment
compensation calculated from the date of the
workmen’s engagement till the date
Labour Court after adjudication of the points of
dispute held that the retrenchment of the
appellant-workman (for short “the workman”) from his
services with ... sanctioned post with effect from
1.1.1987 till his services came to be retrenched, i.e.
on 1.4.1992 and has rendered service of more than
