Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Article 31A, was introduced to safeguard such measures going forward. Additionally, another retrospective provision, Article 31B, was introduced to validate 13 enactments pertaining

criminal proceedings. It provides protection against self-incrimination, double jeopardy, and retrospective punishment.  Article 20(1) prohibits the imposition of retrospective punishment. It states that ... Rattan Lal v. The State of Punjab , the Supreme Court allowed for retrospective application of criminal laws in situations where the issue at hand concerns

nature of amendment, i.e., whether it is at all retrospective in operation, and if not, whether the provision as amended by the Second Amendment ... unless it is expressly or by necessary implication made to have a retrospective operation. But the rule in general is applicable where the object

Constitution of India India Constitution of India CONTITUENTASSEMBLY 00 of 1950 Published in Gazette 00

notification under this sub-section may be issued so as to have retrospective effect to a date not earlier than the 1st day of April

enforcement and to this extent it can be retrospective. The question raised is whether the amendment/substitution of the period with effect from ... taken, the actions cannot be questioned provided the law is clearly retrospective. The only case in which no further action can be taken

Acts, 1974 and 1975 apply to all and there is no discrimination. Retrospective legislation is not by itself discrimination. The changes introduced ... Amendment Act, 1975 further enacted that the amendments shall have retrospective operation so as to apply to and in relation

application to such cases. It was not intended to have retrospective operation so as to take away this vested right ... Judiciary Act, 1903, on which the respondent relied, were not retrospective so as to defeat a right in existence at the time when

master and servant and, therefore, the said section has no retrospective effect. The Tribunal has held that the con- cerned reference will have ... order, dated January 3, 1973, has held that the section is retrospective in its operation and that the employer has got a right to lead

Commissioner Of Income-Tax Bombay Etc vs Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. Etc on 27 May