also witnessed that in number of cases, the Government
has granted retrospective regularisation from the date of initial
appointment. However, such benefit was not granted ... purpose of granting retrospective regularisation.
Disability is no away connected with the point of regularisation or permanent
absorption. The regularisation and permanent absorption
respondent board. Further, the present writ petition is moved seeking for retrospective regularisation from the date on which the writ petitioner was engaged ... accordance with the service rules in force, cannot seek for retrospective regularisation from the date on which they were appointed as contract/daily wage employee
respect of the claim of the writ petitioner for retrospective regularisation of her services with effect from the date of initial appointment and full pension ... services were regularisation. Thus, it is made clear that the regularisation Rules were relaxed in favour of the writ petitioner. The regularisation Rules itself
direct the respondent to regularise the services of the petitioner giving retrospective regularisation together with all the service benefits attached to the post such ... petitioner. In respect of the claim of the writ petitioner for retrospective regularisation, this Court is of an opinion that the same cannot be considered
first respondent, rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner for retrospective regularisation from the date of his initial appointment as Contract Lecturer, is under challenge ... submission that similarly placed persons were given the benefit of retrospective regularisation from the date of their initial appointment on contract basis. Therefore, the same
post. However, the writ petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking retrospective regularisation from the date on which they completed 10 years of service ... further concession either from the Government or from this Court. The retrospective regularisation cannot be granted to these writ petitioners in view of the fact
post. However, the writ petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking retrospective regularisation from the date on which they completed 10 years of service ... further concession either from the Government or from this Court. The retrospective regularisation cannot be granted to these writ petitioners in view of the fact
also witnessed that in number of cases, the Government
has granted retrospective regularisation from the date of initial
appointment. However, such benefit was not granted ... Government, this Court cannot extend
further concession by granting retrospective regularisation. Undoubtedly,
the benefit of regularisation is a concession extended to the writ
petitioners
writ petitioners are constrained to move this writ petition seeking retrospective regularisation from the date on, which they have completed ten years of service ... part time Masalji.
3. This court is of the view that retrospective regularisation in respect of part time appointees or irregular appointment cannot be granted
order dated 18.01.2007 considered similar issue and held that by prospective regularisation, earlier services of the petitioner therein will be wiped out for the purpose ... Rule 48, it was unfortunate that the Government did not grant retrospective regularisation inspite of the fact that the petitioner had been working continuously from