alleged that the charging of Rs. 30/-, more than half of the ticket charge, as rent for the spectacles amounted to restrictive trade practice, actionable ... opposite party by filing written version. According to their version, purchase of ticket would not prove that the complainant was present in the theatre
alleged that the charging of Rs. 30/-, more than half of the ticket charge, as rent for the spectacles amounted to restrictive trade practice, actionable ... opposite party by filing written version. According to their version, purchase of ticket would not prove that the complainant was present in the theatre
Edyma Siregar vs V. V. Satardekar And Anr on 30 April, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Gangadeen vs State Of M.P. on 28 October, 2021
Author: Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava
Bench
Cbi vs . Saras Cabs (P) Ltd. & Ors. on 19 April, 2021
CBI Vs. Saras
Case No. Sc/323/18 Ncb vs . Betty Rame Dated: 25.08.2021 Page No. 1 ... on
Case No. Sc/9512/2016 Ncb vs . Micheal Webuda Dated: 24.03.2021 Page ... on 24 March
Case No. Sc/64/19 Ncb vs . Mohamed Anas Dated: 11.06.2021 Page ... on 11 June
