Mandamus, directing the respondents 1-4 to conduct a Re E-Reverse auction for the Tender No.GM-T/MIA/BMC/PROD ... direct the Respondents to provide rectification remedies in the upcoming E-Reverse Auction process for the tenders.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vijay Anand
For Respondents
prior to the auction, is arbitrary, has no merits and substance, for the reason that the petitioner had participated in the auction and in fact ... permit the petitioner to participate in e-Reverse Auction and to consider its tender along with other bidders in accordance with law. In the case
Singh , 1994(1) SCC 131.?
7.The learned counsel appearing for the auction purchaser pleaded that
his claimant had raised the amount in question through ... conduct of
the judgment debtor and after reversing the decision of the High Court
directed that the auction purchaser be put in possession
A.Abdul Salam vs M/S.South Indian Bank Ltd on 1 October, 2018
Author
order to avoid such circumstances, this Court holds that once the auction notification is published, the members of the petitioner-Association are deemed to have ... Chennai 28 sought for reversal of the increased rent. The prayer in the said writ petition is to quash the auction proceedings for the lease
first respondent has not declared the auction, even at the filing of the writ petition and hence the auction process is per se, sham ... reversal of the order of writ court.
21. Per contra, Mr.S.Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for the Coimbatore Municipal Corporation, submitted that the auction
plaintiffs had the knowledge about the auction sale even prior to the date of auction sale; that the first defendant only after following the procedure ... reversed and the suit is to be dismissed.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents / plaintiffs inter alia argued that no auction was held
Reddy
2. Y.V.S.Reddy
3. Sri Raj & Co
Public Auctioners
7, Sunkurama chetty street,
Chennai 1. ... Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under ... file of 8th Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai dated 29.09.1998 in reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No.224/1995
discharge dept, failing which, informed that the ornaments would be sold in auction on 27.2.1986. The plaintiff paid Rs. 500/- in response to the notice ... sale was in accordance with law. Whereas, the lower appellate court reversed the finding of the trial court on the basis of the conclusion that
whereby an innocent third party who has pur- chased in a valid auction held by the Court should be deprived of his property, merely because ... lose the benefit of his purchase on the contingency of the subsequent reversal of the decree, there will be no inducement to the intending purchasers
