rent became due or on the date of the decree reversing the auction sale of the Putnee Talook belonging to the plaintiff Zamindar, and they ... decided in favour of the date of the decree reversing the auction sale. I do not see that any general principle of interpretation or application
Barmani (1867-69) 12 M.I.A. 244. In that case an auction sale under a certain Bengal regulation of the rights of patnidars ... reversed on appeal, the Judicial Committee holding that the cause of action accrued at the date of the decree reversing the auction sale
cause of action accrued on the date of the decree reversing the auction sale and the consequent revival of the obligation to pay the rent
rent became due, or at the date of the decree reversing the auction sale of the putni taluq belonging to the zemindar, decided in favour
passed
on review by the Munsif at the instance of an auction
purchaser reversing the order of setting aside a sale and
confirmation of possession ... case but no notice of such deposit had
been given to the auction purchaser, the order passed
setting aside the sale was in violation
21st February, 1918) and the date on which the High Court reversed that decision and upheld the sale (23rd February, 1920), should be deducted ... rent became due or at the date of the decree reversing the auction sale of the putni taluk belonging to the zamindar, decided in favour
Judicial Committee that the cause of action accrued upon the reversal of the auction sale and the consequent revival of the obligation
solatium to the Respondent No. l -Auction Purchaser. Executing Court also
noted that the Respondent No. l - Auction Purchaser was not ready to accept ... closed.
On Appeal preferred by the Respondent No. l - Auction Purchaser, the First
Appellate Court reversed the Order passed by the Executing Court. Aggrieved
party or parties to the decree or order on a variation or reversal of which the right to restitution accrued. On the other hand ... Privy Council in 191'3 reversing the decree of the High Court at Calcutta. The auction-purchasers had been in possession since February
order, confirmed on appeal on May 27, 1918, that the other auction purchasers should re-deposit the purchase monies which they had been allowed ... them, should the order setting aside the sale be reversed.
9. Two of these auction-purchasers then instituted separate suits
