thus been propounded
that the impugned resolution would result in reverse discrimination
violating Article 16 (1) of the Constitution of India. Lastly, it has been ... upon by excessive support for group expectations it would amount to
reverse discrimination.
After taking into notice, the rival submissions on behalf of
the parties
justiciability and want of equity. The Supreme Court of the United States reversed the decision and Justice Black rendering the opinion of the Court held ... Framers of the Constitution intended to permit the same vote diluting discrimination to be accomplished through the device of districts containing widely varied numbers
arises and, indeed, it will
be incongruous and a case of reverse discrimination in so far as the petitioners are seeking a mandamus contrary
Reena Kumari vs The State Of Bihar on 8 October, 2024
Author: Anjani Kumar Sharan
each case. In a given case, where
excessiveness results in reverse discrimination, this
Court has to examine individual cases and decide the
matter in accordance
each case. In a given case, where
excessiveness results in reverse discrimination, this
Court has to examine individual cases and decide the
matter in accordance
struck down. At the same time, there also
cannot be any reverse discrimination... In
other words, the essence of Article 30(1) is to
ensure
must be
maintained in such a manner that there was no reverse
discrimination against the general category candidates and that
any rule/circular or order
must be
maintained in such a manner that there was no reverse
discrimination against the general category candidates and that
any rule/circular or order
post from the same selection process
now, it would amount to reverse
discrimination vis-a-vis prospective
candidates who may be now be eligible
