stated that prosecution case clearly
show the sign of reverse engineering as CBI first selected the accused to
implicate and then fabricated the evidence against
Kanwal Chaudri vs Rajan Pant on 5 August, 2024
DLND010166592016
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT
Ranjan Pant vs Kanwal Chaudhri on 5 August, 2024
DLND010166592016
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT
grade/
spurious products by illegally manufacturing them through the
process of reverse engineering in Delhi and further selling those
spurious and fake products
this approach of the
ld. trial court. This kind of reverse engineering is generally
done as a scientific way of verifying if the conclusions drawn
tenant cannot
maintain such suit against defendants, applying the principle of reverse
engineering to the ratio of Sadashiv (supra), landlord too cannot maintain such
suit
tenant
cannot maintain such suit against defendants, applying the principle of reverse
engineering to the ratio of Sadashiv (supra), landlord too cannot maintain such
tenant in the suit property. Applying the principle of reverse engineering it
can be held that Ram Lal was also not the tenant otherwise Jagdish
statement the question has to be reformulated by
doing some reverse engineering. By this process, the question which
was put to the workman
left is a part of the question itself. By
doing some reverse engineering the question may be "Where you are
residing after leaving