also in a
position to ascertain whether any breach of reverse engineering or replication is
committed or attempted.
With regard to the issue of balance ... stated in the said letter
that there was no attempt at reverse engineering and disclosure of the secrets
of Molecor's technology. The allegations
this judgment the apex court reversing the earlier decision of the same court rendered in the case of Gulraj Engineering Construction
order of reversion dated 27 May 1949 passed by the Chief Engineer of Eastern Railway.
2. The petitioner is an Engineering Graduate of the Benares
supra) was reversed by the apex Court in Vikrant Tyres Ltd. v. ITO , (2001) 247 ITR 821 (SC). But this decision was reversed altogether ... notice where the liability accrues on demand and not otherwise. Therefore, this reversal of the decision will not be an answer to the question with
JUDGMENT
A.N. Sen, J.
1. The assessee is an engineering concern undertaking structural steel work, manufacture of railway wagons, etc. By an agreement dated ... Angus Works for the purpose of running it as a heavy engineering workshop. The lease is for a period of 99 years. Under the terms
record reasons ts not that mandatory to warrant reversal of an order solely on the ground of omission to record reasons. if there are materials ... Vlnayak Conclave Put. Ltd. v. LIC (See also Indian Bank v. Metallurgical Engineering Consultants (india) Ltd. : 98 CWN 1145 (DB)]. To sum up, the failure
matter could not go to the
company court. However, this view was reversed in K. Venkat Rao v.
Rockwool (India) Ltdreported at (2002) 108 Comp ... decision of the Calcutta High Court in Hirendra
Bhadra v. Triton Engineering Co. P. Ltd. reported at (1975-76) 80 CWN
242and held that except
appearing on behalf of the appellant has cited the case of Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. and Ors. v. State of Bihar ... deemed to be bad. Here is a case which is quite reverse to it in the instant case. It was a registered partnership firm when
being prosecuted against. This was the view in Hooghly Docking and Engineering Co. 1980(1) CHN 280. Later a Division Bench of the High Court ... Pranati Textiles v. State 1989 Cr. LJ 1804 held in reversal of the decision in Hooghly Docking case that once there was a failure
prescribed quota, at the highest the same would affect diploma
holders engineering promotees who were covered by the other
45% quota. The said group ... trying to reverse
the situation and even if there was appointment made in excess
of the quota, the same was made to reverse the situation
