order to award a contract to a particular party, a reverse engineering
process is evolved to achieve that objective by making the tender
conditions such
appellant as a equivalent product is nothing but a process of reverse engineering in view of the fact that it was admitted before us during
tailor-made for respondent no.4.
Thus, a reverse engineering process has been
deployed in terms whereof, to achieve the objective of
respondent
order to achieve a particular result, a
reverse engineering process was sought to be applied to contend that the
term revenue would include both aeronautical
Patel Engg. Ltd. but
the aforesaid view has not been dissented from or reversed.
This will be evident from the conclusions arrived
judgment of the Supreme Court in Ruston
and Hornby Ltd. v. Zamindara Engineering Co.,
MANU/SC/0304/1969 . The High Court, in appeal, held
that ... Court, white upholding the first part of
the High Court Judgment and reversing the second
part, held that an infringement of a registered trade
mark
nature and type of work in a workshop department of an engineering or automobile concern." We agree that we cannot use analogies to find ... finding of the Labour Appellate Tribunal was reversed because the legal inference from proved facts was wrongly drawn. It is pointed out there that before
Rent Controller. It was held that where a first appellate court reversed the well-considered and well-reasoned findings of the Rent Controller, a substantial ... Court in Ms. Labanya Neogi (through L.R.s) v. W.B. Engineering Co. to oppose any such scrutiny in a second appeal
Palghat And Others, (2010) 8 SCC
767; Union of India Vs. Krafters Engineering And Leasing Private
Limited , (2011) 7 SCC 279 ], this objection ... claim no. 4 to the extent of Rs 3,07,780/-
is reversed.
CLAIM NO. 5
14. Under this head the respondent made a claim
State Of Gujarat vs Utility Users Welfare Association ... on 12 April, 2018
Equivalent citations: 2018