read with Section 424 of the Code, specifically prohibits the altering or reviewing of its order by a Court. Inherent powers cannot be exercised ... Court either in exercise of its appellate or its revisional jurisdiction, no review or revision can be entertained against that judgment as there
contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law shall not entail a review on the merits of the dispute.] (2A) [ An arbitral award arising
liberty of a person; its fundamental purpose is to ensure timely review of illegal detention. The scope and extent of this writ is enunciated
grounds of detention to be communicated and the provision for a review by an advisory board. It's important to note that Article 22 provides
Chief Justice of the concerned High Court may, from time to time, review the panel of arbitrators.] [Inserted by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated
victim or his dependent, informant or witnesses and such Court shall periodically review the protection being offered and pass appropriate orders. (8) Without prejudice
Section 114 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
114. Review .-
Subject as aforesaid, any person considering himself aggrieved- (a) by a decree or order ... reference from a Court of Small Causes, may apply for a review of judgment to the Court which passed the decree or made the order
Clause (2) of Article 323B , runs counter to the power of
judicial review conferred on the High Courts under Articles ... effective substitutes for the High Courts in discharging the
power of judicial review? If not, what are the changes required to make
them conform
counsel, appearing for the
Indian Telecom submits, firstly, the limits of judicial
review in the matter of this kind will have to be examined.
Such ... case the question would be what is the
scope of judicial review? The court could interfere in the
following three categories of cases
1. Quasi
aggrieved. Is an aggrieved person completely deprived of the remedy
of judicial review, if he has lost at the hands of the original court ... appellate jurisdiction. One consequence of
this is that the court will not review findings
of fact reached by the inferior court or
tribunal, even
