00002/2017/CAT/BANGALORE
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCH
REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 170/00002/2017
IN
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.170/00758/2016
DATED THIS ... Income Tax,
Karnataka & Goa Region,
Queens Road,
Bangalore - 560 001. .....Review Applicants
(By Shri M.V. Rao, Senior Panel Counsel)
Vs.
1. K. Murugeshwaran
Punjab 1996 LIC 1623.
5. Another main legal issue is that the Reviewing Authority has decided the appeal. Rule 22 of the Rules, does ... order. The authority who issued the impugned order has no power to review his own order. Hence, the impugned order passed under Rule
SLJ128(CAT)
ORDER
Mukesh Kumar Gupta, Member (J)
1. The petitioners seek review of an order dated 9.1.2000 passed by a Bench of this Tribunal ... petitioners had any grievance they can approach this Tribunal for review of its order and hence the present R.As.
2. The basic grounds urged
wider public interest, constitutional process and power and
responsibility of Judicial review?
21. So, therefore, what is the mandate of the constitution of India,
then
Apex Court stated that :
"6. .... The scope of judicial review in matters of transfer of a
government servant to an equivalent post without ... held that the
said policy decisions should be least interfered in judicial review and that
the Government employees have no absolute right under Article
Apex Court stated that :
"6. .... The scope of judicial review in matters of transfer of a
government servant to an equivalent post without ... held that the
said policy decisions should be least interfered in judicial review and that
the Government employees have no absolute right under Article
Apex Court stated that :
"6. .... The scope of judicial review in matters of transfer of a
government servant to an equivalent post without ... held that the
said policy decisions should be least interfered in judicial review and that
the Government employees have no absolute right under Article
Apex Court stated that :
"6. .... The scope of judicial review in matters of transfer of a
government servant to an equivalent post without ... held that the
said policy decisions should be least interfered in judicial review and that
the Government employees have no absolute right under Article
Apex Court stated that :
"6. .... The scope of judicial review in matters of transfer of a
government servant to an equivalent post without ... held that the
said policy decisions should be least interfered in judicial review and that
the Government employees have no absolute right under Article
Apex Court stated that :
"6. .... The scope of judicial review in matters of transfer of a
government servant to an equivalent post without ... held that the
said policy decisions should be least interfered in judicial review and that
the Government employees have no absolute right under Article
