merit, it would be appropriate to refer to the principles governing judicial review of the disciplinary matters as emerged from the case ... settled law that the Tribunal has only power of judicial review of the administrative action of the appellate on complaints relating to service conditions
only remedy available to the affected persons is to file a review of the judgment which affects them and not to file a fresh application ... that:
...Section 22(3)(f) of the Act empowers the Tribunal to review its decisions. Rule 17 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure and Rules
NAGIN NANDA, EXPERT MEMBER
1
ORDER
I. Original Application No. 593/2017
Review of proceedings before the Tribunal
1. Proceedings in this matter ... identified polluted river
stretches. This matter now is, and will henceforth be,
reviewed together with the present matter.
O.A. 829/2019: issue of coastal
stakeholders as discussed in
later part of the judgment,
e. designing and reviewing monitoring mechanism from time to
time including grievance redressal.
'Sustainable Sand ... supra and thus not enforceable.
6. On 05.04.2019, the Tribunal conducted comprehensive review of the
matter and noted following issues required consideration. Directions were
issued
petition on 18-6-2004 before the Commissioner of Income-tax to review the order dated 19-5-2003. In the meantime, the assessee received ... registration. The assessee also filed an application on 18-6-2004 to review its earlier order. A similar application was also filed by the assessee
Jamanagar should not be set aside and why an appropriate order in review should not be passed directing recovery of Rs. 26,04,372 which ... natural justice while passing the impugned order dt. 20th July, 1970 in review. The concerned authority was directed to decide the matter afresh within three
also, he was graded as `Good, which ACR was not reviewed. The Applicants contention in this OA is that :
the ACR below the benchmark ... been taken into consideration by the DPC because it had not been reviewed by the reviewing authority and, therefore, it was an incomplete
duty. In the circumstances Shri Chandrasekharan raised a preliminary objection that the review notice of the Central Govt. was barred by limitation since the same ... case cited. Following the decision cited supra we held that the review notice should be held to have become barred by time
upheld the constitutionality of Act 21 of 1985.
6. In the meantime, review petitions were filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court which were ... Supreme Court of India has finally disposed of the review petitions on 3-10-1991, on legal advice, UCIL claimed deduction of the liability
Court. He submits that the present application is actually an application for review in the garb of an ROM application and as the Tribunal ... powers to review its own order, the application merits rejection.
5. We have carefully considered the submissions of both the sides. We find that
