Service
working as CIT and CCIT for further promotion by a review DPC on the
ground that the ACRs in question were below bench mark ... Reviewing Officer or
both are available or not. In case, the ACR is upgraded, making the
incumbent eligible for consideration, review DPC would be held
time to review the performance of the appellant whereas in fact one Menon had reviewed it. The latter was not competent to review the performance ... made by the DPC as an appellate authority. The DPC would come to its own conclusion on the basis of review by an officer
December, 1995 the Chief
Secretary passed an order to convene a review DPC in
respect of promotion of the petitioner to the post of
SREO ... December, 1994 it was decided to review the
aforesaid promotion by convening review DPC as
according to the official respondents, the petitioner
was not eligible
Therefore, there was a proposal to hold a meeting of the review
DPC to consider the cases of Junior Engineers for their promotion as
Asstt ... been nominated as
representative of SC/ST category in the said Review DPC as per the
instructions of the Government of India in this regard
mandamus directing the respondents to hold a Review DPC for the said
post.
2. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the fact that his representation ... Reviewing Officer or both are available or not. In case, the
ACR is upgraded, making the incumbent eligible for
consideration, review DPC would be held
ACRs, which was
accepted. On 27th and 28th December, 2010, a review DPC was convened to
consider the case of the respondent and five others ... regular DPC. The
direction of the CAT is also with respect to sealed cover of the
regular DPC. The regular DPC for the panel year
setting aside the assessment made by the Second
Review Departmental Promotion Committee („Review DPC‟) held on 16th
May, 2014, and directing that a fresh DPC ... specific comments of the reporting, reviewing and accepting
authorities."
17. The Second Review DPC picked up the ACR for 1991-92 and
reproduced
sent a representation to the petitioners for holding a review DPC for the
vacancies of the year 2009-10. Since no response was received ... sought a
direction to the petitioner herein for convening a review DPC for the
vacancy of SAG which had arisen in the year
Foreman w.e.f. 15.09.1986 given by the
Review DPC held on 21.03.1996, be declared void ab initio.
Consequential prayer is made that the petitioner ... vide SRO No. 246/1981 and directed to hold a Review
DPC for vacancies available after 12.09.1981 upto 28.01.1992 to the
post of Chargeman Grade
respondent with a direction to the petitioners to
convene a review DPC for the year 2007-2008 and re-consider the
case of the respondent ... upgraded from
„Good‟ to „Very Good‟, his request for holding a review DPC could
not be acceded to, as the OM dated 13.04.2010, issued
