every right to make correction/review of the
answers and in exercise of such power the answer script of the petitioner was
assessed.
12. Referring ... candidates are not
examiners of the answer scripts. The resolution for the examination process
of the answer script is only for the examiners
obtaining his answer scripts in terms of
the provisions laid down under the Right to
Information Act, 2005 . The answer scripts were
provided ... revealed upon reassessment/review of the answer
script of the petitioner of the History (Pass)
answer script of the 12th RLST conducted by the
respondent
questions in respect of
the evaluation of his answer scripts and claimed the
relief for review/re-assessment/re-evaluation
thereof. The relevant rules governing ... answer scripts of the aspirant. In as much as, the
Court is not the expert to assess the answer scripts of
the aspirant petitioner.
Considering
noticing a glaring injustice can direct such re-evaluation of the answer
script of the petitioner even though the statute does not expressly provide ... answer script of the petitioner. This implied a
clear prohibition on the part of the examining authority to reassess the answer
script of an examinee
impugned order dated 10.7.2013, neither the certified copies of their (applicants/petitioners) answer booklets are being provided to them nor they are allowed to make ... their request for being furnished with their answer scripts.
The instant application is one, in substance, seeking review of the order dated 10.7.2013 based
written examination for Class -XII
Board. The petitioner has challenged this.
The answering respondents are respondent
nos. 2 and 3. They are not represented despite ... next day.
The petitioner shall also make his submission
whether review of the answer script is permitted
under the relevant law.
The matter shall appear
initial and first result, which was again made subject matter of judicial review by fresh writ application with reference to 21 questions and that ... dealing with the question of application of erroneous Model Answer Key for evaluation of answer scripts of candidates appearing in a competitive examination observed that
initial and first result, which was again made subject matter of judicial review by fresh writ application with reference to 21 questions and that ... dealing with the question of application of erroneous Model Answer Key for evaluation of answer scripts of candidates appearing in a competitive examination observed that
initial and first result, which was again made subject matter of judicial review by fresh writ application with reference to 21 questions and that ... dealing with the question of application of erroneous Model Answer Key for evaluation of answer scripts of candidates appearing in a competitive examination observed that
initial and first result, which was again made subject matter of judicial review by fresh writ application with reference to 21 questions and that ... dealing with the question of application of erroneous Model Answer Key for evaluation of answer scripts of candidates appearing in a competitive examination observed that
