entertain the Petition for Review as well as the
Application to condone delay in filing the Review
Petition, as are vested in the Civil Court ... petition to condone delay is not maintainable.
18. In regard to the maintainability of the Petition to
condone the delay, the learned Counsel
Review Petition should be filed within 30 days and
the Petition for Review filed beyond that date, cannot be
entertained and this Review petition also ... delay in
filing the Review Petition along with the Review Petition. As
a matter of fact, the Petitioner filed Review Petition on
23.2.2013 along with
Review. Even though, the said Review
Petition No. 47 of 2008 was dismissed it again rushed to the
Central Commission and filed second Review Petition ... delay in filing the Review Petition, the
Central Commission has to take a decision as to the Review Petition
can be entertained or not. Accordingly
filed this
Review Petition.
3. In this Review Petition, the State Commission has sought for
the review of the findings in the above judgment ... filing the Petition for Review, the
Petitioner filed IA No.262 of 2012, along with Review
Petition praying for condonation of delay of 818 days
Review Petition filed
by the Appellant holding that the Review Petition could not
be entertained not only because of the long delay which ... Review.
Thus, the State Commission has rejected the
prayer of the Review petitioner to condone delay
and dismissed the Review Petition while
exercising the Review
review petition filed. The Review Petition was disposed only on
02.04.2019. There are several Judgements of this Tribunal which
have condoned substantial delay in filing ... Review Petition was
not condoned by the State Commission. Learned counsel further
highlighted that the Review Petition itself was filed with substantial
delay
Commission after hearing the
parties dismissed those Review Petitions
on 17.12.2009.
Against this order dismissing the
review Petitions, the Appellant filed
Appeal ... approached the
Central Commission and filed the Review
Petitions.
(d) After the rejection of the said Review Petition
the Appellant filed an Appeal as against
Appellant filed the review along with an application
for condonation of delay before the UPERC as there was a delay of 93
days ... exercise its
jurisdiction and authority in not condoning the delay of filing
the review petition?
G. Whether the State Commission while deciding the review
petition
petition is filed
against the order passed in the review petition provided the
review petition was filed prior to filing of special leave petition
against ... petition is filed against the order passed in the review
petition provided the review petition was filed prior to filing of
special leave petition against
juuicata when a special
leave petition is filed against the order passed in the
review petition provided the review petition was filed ... petition is filed against the
order passed in the review petition provided the review
petition was filed prior to filing of special leave petition
against
