delay in
representation application even before the numbering of the review
petition, the review petition was rejected. Insofar as refund of court fees
in appeals ... review petition is rejected. We need to now examine as to whether
Sections 66 of the Act also apply to review petition.
5. Heard
review petition filed by the petitioner was rejected by stating two reasons viz., the Government have no role to review the petition and the review ... Directors Meeting. The review petition having been filed on 14.8.2006, the same is within six months. Therefore rejection of review petition by the Government
Review Petition on 14.11.2008, which needs no necessity and justification to direct the 1st respondent to reconsider and take on file the Review Petition already ... order by way of appeal/review. Further, the reasons adduced for the delay in filing the Review Petition was duly considered by the 1st respondent
review petition was filed by
the petitioner to review the judgment and decree passed in
O.S.No.11074 of 2010. The Review Petition ... Review Petition. Mere filing of a review petition cannot be
considered as a ground for the purpose of condoning such a delay
filed a review petition in Review Petition No.225 of 2016 and
thereafter, the present appeal is filed with a delay of 753 days ... Review
Petition. Mere filing of a review petition cannot be considered as a
ground for the purpose of condoning such a delay.
13. Considering
filed a review petition in Review Petition No.225 of 2016 and
thereafter, the present appeal is filed with a delay of 753 days ... Review
Petition. Mere filing of a review petition cannot be considered as a
ground for the purpose of condoning such a delay.
13. Considering
petition is filed against the order passed in the Review Petition provided the review petition was filed prior to filing of special leave petition against ... High Court allows the review petition filed after the special leave petition was dismissed after condoning the delay, it would be treated as affront
Supreme Court on 25.08.2014 on the ground of delay. Review Petitions
(Civil) Nos.2898 to 2934 of 2014 to review the dismissal order dated ... appreciating the evidence which is beyond the scope of
the review petition. Moreover, it would also be beyond the directions issued
present group of petitions are to excuse the delay in filing the relative review petitions, which have not yet been numbered. The petitioners are guilty ... litigation.
18. The civil miscellaneous petitions for excusing the delay in filing the applications for review of the earlier judgments of this court are therefore
Mr.Bader Sayeed vs )The Southern India Education Trust on 3 August, 2012
Author: S
