answers qua which had been wrongly mentioned in the
revised/final answer keys and re-evaluate the answer sheets of the
petitioners and declared
xxxx
VI. The Board shall make available the answer key
on its website at about 6 pm on the conclusion of
last meeting ... examined by subject experts
whose opinion will be final.
VIII. The revised key will be uploaded on the website
for general information but no representation
answers thereof
declared by the respondents by way of publishing the revised
Answer Key, have prayed that the respondents be directed to
constitute a committee ... WRIT PETITION NO.5685/14 and one connected matter)
25
the revised Answer Key, it is not in dispute that all the
grievances raised
revised key on 1.10.2013 (P-7).
Thereafter the list of selected candidates on the basis of
their merit determined keeping in view the revised answer ... keys of Booklet Set-B and have revised the Answer key
to question nos.56, 58, 15 & 37 while maintaining the
Answer key
invalid, the writ petitioners solicited interference with the results and the final answer key, and sought for a direction to the respondents to conduct ... candidates unsuccessful, returned to this Court with fresh challenges to the revised answer-key dated 19.11.2012, published by the Commission seeking a direction
invalid, the writ petitioners solicited interference with the results and the final answer key, and sought for a direction to the respondents to conduct ... candidates unsuccessful, returned to this Court with fresh challenges to the revised answer-key dated 19.11.2012, published by the Commission seeking a direction
invalid, the writ petitioners solicited interference with the results and the final answer key, and sought for a direction to the respondents to conduct ... candidates unsuccessful, returned to this Court with fresh challenges to the revised answer-key dated 19.11.2012, published by the Commission seeking a direction
invalid, the writ petitioners solicited interference with the results and the final answer key, and sought for a direction to the respondents to conduct ... candidates unsuccessful, returned to this Court with fresh challenges to the revised answer-key dated 19.11.2012, published by the Commission seeking a direction
invalid, the writ petitioners solicited interference with the results and the final answer key, and sought for a direction to the respondents to conduct ... candidates unsuccessful, returned to this Court with fresh challenges to the revised answer-key dated 19.11.2012, published by the Commission seeking a direction
invalid, the writ petitioners solicited interference with the results and the final answer key, and sought for a direction to the respondents to conduct ... candidates unsuccessful, returned to this Court with fresh challenges to the revised answer-key dated 19.11.2012, published by the Commission seeking a direction