seventh respondent for construction of commercial complex having regard to the revised layout plan approved by the second respondent-Board. The learned Counsel would further ... writ petition. He would submit that according to the revised layout of the Housing Board, the site was earmarked for shops. He would further submit
approved by the Director. The latter sent a revised layout approved by him to
the Ananthapur Municipality in May, 1969. D.1 informed plaintiff ... receipt of the revised layout and requested plaintiff to proceed with
the layout of roads as per layout incurring expenditure and assuring that
defendants would
would also submit that when the Society allegedly submitted a revised layout which was approved by the Cantonment Board on 27.2.1990, though the same ... which has shown plot No. 17 as well. In the revised layout which was approved in favour of the Society plot No. 17 stood deleted
revised layout, about three years after the layout was initially sanctioned. He contends that the written statement did not refer to the revised layout ... stated that the layout was revised and the suit land was left as open space. The revised layout is marked
laws and this is further reduced in the revised layout to 24%.
It indicates that the revised layout approved by the Cantonment Board ... converted into a plot in the revised layout and shown as plot No.14/A. The back lane towards northern and southern side of plot
line. Accordingly on 4-1-2003 the 2nd respondent submitted revised layout plan and EIA to the pollution control Board ... Control Board dated 18-1-2003 are as under:
"2. Revised layout furnished showing all the pollution generating activities and units such as Hotels
agreed that the excess plots will be available as per the revised layout and the said plots will be sold to the members ... payment of betterment charges, the society decided to apply for revised layout to convert open space into plots and to pay the amounts
Hyderabad (M.C.H.) not to grant any permission in the said layout, as till today the Society is not having full-fledged amenities ... stated that the Society has changed layout pattern without obtaining a revised layout. The plot numbers allegedly owned by the petitioners are not tallying
Hyderabad during the year 1991; and that as per the revised layout, the 1st appellant-petitioner was allotted Plot ... appellant-petitioner was allotted Plot No. 303-O. As per the revised layout No. 310/59,180/TP/HO/86, dated
time the property was
purchased in 1957, there is no layout; that layout No.41/58 and LP
No.18/60 came into existence only ... reserved for open
space in LP No.41/58-revised layout LP No.18/60.
31. On 02-08-2010, in the said
