stated that approved plan was further revised
as follows:-
c) TP/DTP 103/69:-
In the revised layout area reserved for commercial
purpose ... furnish revised layouts or amended layouts on
the local body.
As seen from the layouts approved TP/DTP
178/61 and the revised layout
stated that approved plan was further revised
as follows:-
c) TP/DTP 103/69:-
In the revised layout area reserved for commercial
purpose ... furnish revised layouts or amended layouts on
the local body.
As seen from the layouts approved TP/DTP
178/61 and the revised layout
stated that approved plan was further revised
as follows:-
c) TP/DTP 103/69:-
In the revised layout area reserved for commercial
purpose ... furnish revised layouts or amended layouts on
the local body.
As seen from the layouts approved TP/DTP
178/61 and the revised layout
Sanctioned Layout No.4/72 (Revised Layout of
T.P/D.T.P.No.132/68). As per the aforesaid approved layout, the total
extent ... appears to have been later revised vide Plan Approval No.20/72 by the
DTCP. In the said layout, the land measuring an extent
Industrial Layout and the same was
forwarded by the third respondent to the first respondent. The first
respondent granted an approval for the layout ... submitted that on 15.10.2018, the third respondent also
approved the revised layout subject to the conditions as mentioned in the
approved layout plan. After
above proceedings clearly states that the proposal for grant
of layout approval was kept deferred. Contrary to the above order, the
impugned order now been ... been
issued based on a revised legal opinion given by another Government
Pleader on 12.11.2021 stating that no layout approval could be granted in
favour
called upon the first defendant to obtain a
revised FMB sketch recording the actual physical layout of the lands. The
first defendant had obtained
called upon the first defendant to obtain a
revised FMB sketch recording the actual physical layout of the lands.
The first defendant had obtained
layout approval was submitted by the petitioner.
Thereafter, a revised plan of layout approval was submitted by the petitioner
to the second respondent
petitioner appears to have obtained layout
approval under the provision of the Tamil Nadu
Regularization of Unapproved Plots and Layouts Rules,
2017. Aggrieved ... Development Officer has no revision
power to revise the same. The petitioner
ought to challenge the layout approval
by way of filing an appeal
