HCHP
12
specifically withdrawn the claim for depreciation by filing
revised return?"
.
The assessment year is 1988-89.
The Supreme Court in the case ... held that if the revised return filed by the
assessee is a valid return and the assessee has withdrawn the
claim for depreciation that
HCHP
12
specifically withdrawn the claim for depreciation by filing
revised return?"
.
The assessment year is 1988-89.
The Supreme Court in the case ... held that if the revised return filed by the
assessee is a valid return and the assessee has withdrawn the
claim for depreciation that
HCHP
12
specifically withdrawn the claim for depreciation by filing
revised return?"
.
The assessment year is 1988-89.
The Supreme Court in the case ... held that if the revised return filed by the
assessee is a valid return and the assessee has withdrawn the
claim for depreciation that
HCHP
12
specifically withdrawn the claim for depreciation by filing
revised return?"
.
The assessment year is 1988-89.
The Supreme Court in the case ... held that if the revised return filed by the
assessee is a valid return and the assessee has withdrawn the
claim for depreciation that
HCHP
12
specifically withdrawn the claim for depreciation by filing
revised return?"
.
The assessment year is 1988-89.
The Supreme Court in the case ... held that if the revised return filed by the
assessee is a valid return and the assessee has withdrawn the
claim for depreciation that
HCHP
12
specifically withdrawn the claim for depreciation by filing
revised return?"
.
The assessment year is 1988-89.
The Supreme Court in the case ... held that if the revised return filed by the
assessee is a valid return and the assessee has withdrawn the
claim for depreciation that
Bal Krishan And Others vs State Of H.P. And Others on 15 December, 2015
Court On Its Own Motion vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 2 January
Sh. Lin Kuei Tsan vs Sh. Ashok Kumar Goel on 14 July, 2015
Author: Tarlok
State Of H.P. vs . Sita Devi on 20 July, 2023
Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan
