exemption-Expiring
during pendency of eviction suit-Effect of-Once rights
crystallise adjudication to be in accordance with law.
%
Statutory Constitution: Purposive interpretation ... must be instituted
within the stipulated period of 10 years. Once rights
crystallise the adjudication must be in accordance with law.
[535E
rights of the 'B' Wing teachers had become crystallised. The rights so crystallised cannot be taken away by resorting to the rule-making ... working out the same cannot be avoided in view of the rights crystallised by the rules and judgments of the Courts of the rights crystallised
that is the position on the date when the
rights crystallised and in view of clause (s) of section ... that is the position on the date when the
rights crystallised and in view of sub-section (s) of sec-
tion
granting maintenance to a divorced Muslim wife is passed, then her rights are crystallised and she gets vested rights to get maintenance from her former ... visualise how it can be held that the right of the divorced wife get crystallised under S. 125 of the Code and cannot be taken
granting maintenance to a divorced Muslim wife is passed, then her rights are crystallised and she gets vested rights to get maintenance from her former ... visualise how it can be held that the right of the divorced wife get crystallised under S. 125 of the Code and cannot be taken
absence of any pre-existing or crystallised right.
5. The learned counsel on either side placed reliance on various
decisions.
6. A learned Division Bench ... existing right which was already adjudicated, determined or
crystallised right.
10. In the instant case, the order passed by the appellate authority
under Section
absence of any pre-existing or crystallised right.
5. The learned counsel on either side placed reliance on various
decisions.
6. A learned Division Bench ... existing right which was already adjudicated, determined or
crystallised right.
10. In the instant case, the order passed by the appellate authority
under Section
Bachan Singh Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab Etc. Etc on 16 August, 1982
Equivalent
clearly that the notion of legitimate
expectation (falling short of a legal right) was
too nebulous to form a basis for invalidating the
exercise ... withdrawing an
undertaking, was taken. It did not involve any
crystallised right. The protection of such
legitimate expectation did not require the
fulfilment
Hence, the conferment of right on the daughter did not
disturb the rights which got crystallised by partition before
20.12.2004.
6
(iii) Unamended Section ... section 6(5) cannot be interpreted to take
away the rights crystallised upon the surviving coparceners of the
joint family under the statutory partition
