Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

sentinel and as the guardian of equal rights protection should not be forgotten. 5. This Court has also on occasions issued directions which could

sentinel and as the guardian of equal rights protection should not be forgotten. 5. This Court has also on occasions issued directions which could

through open bidding tender process and as per the terms whereof the rights being created in the shops were of a licencee for a period ... cannot convert the said licence into leasehold. D. It cannot be forgotten that the subject shops are public property, the disposal whereof

claiming to be in possession of the property as a matter of right. In 1997 though the respondent/defendant left the property ... respondent/defendant. If the said Shri G.R. Kohli claimed any right in the property it was for him to pursue his application, become

thus, found that a case had been made out to grant recovery rights to the insurance company which otherwise was directed to specify the award ... there was no clear direction with regard to the recovery rights. 5. The claimants filed appeal (MAC.APP.No.888/2010) contending that the compensation

Simran @ Meena Khan vs State on 27 May, 2016 Author: Sunita Gupta Bench: Sunita Gupta

respondent before initiating proceedings under the PP Act . It cannot also be forgotten that this was the second round before the learned District Judge with ... wherefrom it could be said that the respondent has a right to continue in the premises. 17. The only other reason given by the District

written statement of defence that the petitioner had stated that he had forgotten to mention about cash declared in the PCD Register and had signed ... Memo hurriedly at the instance of the Vigilance Inspector. The defence was rightly rejected. The Tribunal was of the view that non availability

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs State on 9 December, 2016 Author: R.K. Gauba Bench

revisional power which does not exist. The Commissioner was, therefore, not right in holding that it was not open to him to give relief ... claim appropriate relief. But it should not be forgotten that the power to be exercised under Section 264 is a revisionary one. The limitations implicit