The Secretary (Labour) vs A on 24 January, 2009
sentinel and as the guardian of
equal rights protection should not be forgotten.
19. The management is an instrumentality of the Government
Search Results Page
Search Results
51 - 60 of 1723 (1.57 seconds)Delhi vs Uma Devi & Ors. And (2006) 2 Scc on 2 September, 2008
sentinel and as the guardian of
equal rights protection should not be forgotten.
"43. Thus, it is clear that adherence to the rule ... proper competition among
qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the
appointee. If it is a contractual appointment, the appointment
comes
Delhi vs Uma Devi & Ors. And (2006) 2 Scc on 12 September, 2008
sentinel and as the guardian of
equal rights protection should not be forgotten.
"43. Thus, it is clear that adherence to the rule ... proper competition among
qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the
appointee. If it is a contractual appointment, the appointment
comes
State vs . on 2 March, 2012
admitted that on the right hand
of driver, his name was tatooed. He had forgotten these facts due to
lapse of time.
15 In cross
Arpita @ Premwati vs Central Board Of Secondary Education on 30 July, 2022
respect of change of name effected in
exercise of right to be forgotten) and to insert
caption/annotation indicating the date on which
Central Board Of Secondary Education vs Ms. Nidhi Singh on 26 July, 2021
name effected in exercise of right to be
RCA No.15/2020 Page no. 13 / 14
forgotten) and to insert caption/annotation indicating the date
The Case Of The Workman Is That He Has Been ... vs Uoi on 18 February, 2008
sentinel and as the guardian of equal
rights protection should not be forgotten.
This court has also on occasions issued directions
which could
State vs . Ved Prakash on 22 December, 2021
during such period. While coming to this conclusion, the rights
of victim cannot be forgotten. Although it is claimed that Rs.
30,000/- was spent
Smt. Savitri Devi vs Sh. Dayanand Rawat on 20 November, 2014
must not be forgotten that a valuable
Savitri Devi Vs. Dayanand Rawat CR No. 70/13 Page No. 2/5
right has accrued in favour
Rajeev Sood S/O Sh. O. P. Singh vs Chatali Sood W/O Sh. Rajeev Sood on 12 February, 2013
therefore, rightly fixed the matter for hearing
on the said application. But then, midÂway the hearing she
seems to have forgotten that what